Editors Guidelines

Expectations for editorial leadership in dentistry and oral implants.

• Assess scope fit and methodological rigor
• Select qualified reviewers in dentistry and implantology
• Provide clear recommendations and decision rationale
• Maintain ethical and transparent review practices
• Monitor timelines and support timely decisions

Editors evaluate originality, clinical relevance, and methodological quality. Decisions are based on reviewer feedback and alignment with JDOI scope.

Clear decision letters help authors respond effectively and improve the quality of revised submissions.

• Accept with minor revisions
• Revise and resubmit with major changes
• Reject with detailed guidance for resubmission elsewhere
• Transfer recommendation when scope fit is limited

For major revisions, provide structured guidance that separates essential methodological changes from optional improvements. Encourage authors to respond point by point for clarity.

Editors may request additional reviews when revisions introduce new data or alter study conclusions.

If conflicts of interest arise, editors should recuse themselves and alert the editorial office. Transparent handling protects integrity and fairness.

Complex cases or ethical concerns can be escalated to senior editors for guidance and resolution.

• Sound study design and appropriate analysis
• Clear dental or implantology relevance
• Ethics and consent documentation present
• Transparent data and reporting standards
• Conclusions supported by evidence

Editors are expected to keep review timelines on track and communicate promptly with the editorial office about delays. Timely decisions improve author experience and reduce administrative follow up.

If specialized input is required, editors may recommend additional reviewers or consult senior editors.

Document key decision points and rationale to support consistency across revisions and to assist editors who may handle later stages of the manuscript.

JDOI supports authors, editors, and reviewers with timely guidance on scope, policies, and workflows. If you need clarification on requirements, data statements, or review timelines, contact the editorial office at [email protected]. We can provide templates, examples, and best-practice recommendations to help you move forward confidently. Our responses typically include next steps, resource links, and a clear point of contact. Early communication helps avoid delays, ensures consistent compliance, and improves the overall publication experience. For database verification, APC documentation, or ManuscriptZone access issues, please email the editorial office with your manuscript title and contact details.