Abstract
The present study was designed to examine differences among cancer patients who died by medical/natural causes or by suicide. This study aims to identify protective and risk factors for suicide in individuals who have been diagnosed with cancer. Unlike previous studies that examined suicidality in cancer patients, our study did not find significant differences between patients with a cancer diagnosis at TOD who died by suicide and those who died by natural or medical causes.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2018
Perez Jalessa, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
An elevated risk of suicide has been found in patients with severe, chronic, and life-threatening forms of medical illness, even after adjusting for depression. The risks for suicidal behaviors are greatest within the first year following cancer diagnosis. Depression is among the most common psychological responses to receiving a cancer diagnosis. The present study was designed to examine differences among cancer patients who died by medical/natural causes or by suicide. This study aims to identify protective and risk factors for suicide in individuals who have been diagnosed with cancer. Risk and protective factors may vary for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and death by suicide among cancer patients and other populations.
Results
Risk and protective factors for suicide in cancer patients were assessed by comparing individual who died by suicide or natural causes on several dependent measures. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS version 22.0. Chi-square analyses were used to examine categorical variables such as demographic variables and cancer characteristics. Independent t-tests were used to examine continuous variables such as age at TOD. Analyses revealed several trends that did not reach statistical significance. Cancer patients who died by suicide and natural causes were similar on demographic features (see Cancer characteristics were compared across the groups regarding when the subjects were first diagnosed with cancer, recent hospitalization due to medical causes, and current chemotherapy treatment ( = p < .06 Cancer patients who died by suicide or natural causes showed similar levels of social support. There were no significant between-group differences in family support (χ2(1, 18) = 1.00, There were no significant differences in psychiatric morbidity between cancer patients who died by suicide or natural/medical causes (see = p < .06
Characteristic
Suicide Group9
Natural Death Group9
Sex
Male
67%
78%
Female
33%
22%
Race/ Ethnicity
Caucasian
78%
100%
African American
11%
0%
Asian
11%
0%
Marital Status
Married
45%
45%
Never Married
22%
22%
Divorced
11%
33%
Widowed
22%
0%
Age
Mean (SD)
66.6 (15.4)
59.3 (7.3)
Cancer Characteristics
Suicide Group9
Natural Death Group9
χ2
Recent Cancer Diagnosis
11%
33%
1.29
Recent Hospitalization
33%
11%
1.29
Current Chemotherapy
11%
0%
1.06
Other Medical Illness
89%
100%
1.06
Current Pain
33%
11%
1.29
Current Pain Medication
33%
33%
0.00
Financial Burden Due to Medical Bills
0%
33%
3.60
Diagnoses
Suicide Group9
Natural Death Group9
χ2
Depression
100%
67%
3.60
Chronic
22%
44%
1.00
Recurrent
44%
11%
2.49
Alcohol Use Disorder
22%
55%
2.10
Substance Use Disorder
11%
44%
2.49
Psychotic condition
33%
11%
1.29
Anxiety disorder
22%
33%
0.28
Discussion
The aim of the study was to evaluate cancer patients who died by medical or natural causes or by suicide, and to identify protective and risk factors for suicide in those who have been diagnosed with cancer. Unlike previous studies that examined suicidality in cancer patients, our study did not find significant differences between patients with a cancer diagnosis at TOD who died by suicide and those who died by natural or medical causes. There were no statistically significant differences between our two cohorts, but there were several trends in the data that approached significance. Results suggest that a diagnosis of a depressive disorder (Major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, or depression not otherwise specified) at TOD may be a signal for increased risk of completed suicide following a diagnosis of cancer. This may be a clinically useful finding that health-care providers should take into account when delivering cancer diagnosis to older adults. Medical providers could make use of quick depression screeners to assess need for further evaluation or referral to mental health providers. Specifically, with the knowledge that a history of depression could hasten the desire for death among patients with terminal cancer, heavy emphasis on the importance of maintaining one s mental health throughout the course of treatment or into the next stages of the disease must be conveyed to the patient. Recurrent depression was not found to be significantly different between both groups. Further research could explore if new onsets of depressive disorders or depression severity presents as a risk factor for suicide in cancer patients. Another finding that approached significance was a higher likelihood of having a financial burden due to medical bills in the natural death group. Financial burden as a protective factor seems counterintuitive as financial difficulties are associated with suicide risk. Psychological autopsies of suicide decedents and natural deaths require consent and participation from next-of-kin who provide data while mourning. Suicide, especially among cancer patients, is a rare event. The present study was limited because of the small sample size. The sample size was reduced further when data from decedents who were not known to be aware of their cancer diagnosis were removed from the study. Statistical power is an important factor when attempting to determine statistical differences between populations. Power is the probability that a test will correctly reject the null hypothesis indicated a significant difference. With our current sample size (N = 18) the power (0.56) is insufficient to reject the null hypothesis. For a sufficient power (0.80) the estimated sample size (31.40) would need to be increased approximately 57%. Considering the current level of power in our analyses, results approaching significance are promising. Further research with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate risk and protective factors in individuals who die by suicide. Findings shed light on characteristics that may increase suicide risk in cancer patients. Adults who are diagnosed with cancer may experience similar struggles at similar rates, with the emotional burden of the cancer diagnosis being especially prominent among both groups. It is important for clinicians and physicians to be acutely aware of the risk of suicidal behavior among the terminally ill, providing the resources and therapeutic support that is available for battling severe sickness and psychological distress.