Abstract
Callus and biomass culture of
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2018
Ranjan Mishra Malay, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Plants are rich source of a number of secondary metabolites including the alkaloids with an estimated count of around 3000 different types till date Plant cell and tissue culture technique is widely used method to enhance the accumulation of such therapeutic secondary metabolites in a wide range of plants In the present study we are applying factors such as physical state, concentrations and types of nutrient salts (MS and B5), the level of sucrose, and combinations of plant growth regulators with the aim to create stress conditions similar to that experience by plant in the field as an inductive force for enhanced production of total alkaloids containing higher amount of anticancer vincristine and vinblastine.
Materials And Methods
The The leaf explants were collected washed thoroughly under running tap water for 15 min. Surface disinfection was carried by treating with amild antiseptic solution (1% Savlon, GSK India) and 8-10 drops of Tween-20 for 5-8 min by continuous shaking. Further, surface sterilization was carried under aseptic environment over a Laminar Air Flow hood by treating first with 70% ethanol for 60 seconds followed by 0.05% HgCl2 for about 15 minutes with continuous stirring to ensure complete sterilization. Thereafter the explants were washed 3-4 times with autoclaved double distilled water to remove traces of HgCl2. The surface sterilized leaf explants were inoculated on the variously modified culture medium. The leaf explants were prepared either as circular disks with 1 cm diameter using a sterile cork borer or a squire segment of 1 cm2. Initially cultures were established following the standard protocols To study the effect of nutrient strength on growth and multiplication of callus, biomass and alkaloid yield three different types of nutrient media (half strength, full strength and one and half strength) was prepared for both MS and B5 in agar and in suspension along with standard sucrose and PGR combination. Callus and biomass obtained from both the medium were further used for alkaloid extraction and quantification. The pH of the culture media was adjusted to 5.8 ± 0.2 prior to autoclaving (121°C, 15 min) and solidified with 1% agar (if required). The cultures were maintained at 25 ± 2 °C in an environmentally controlled air conditioned room. The culture racks were provided with a 16 h photoperiod under a photon flux density of 2,000-3,000 Lux, provided by fluorescent lamps. Induction of callus from leaf explants was initiated as per the standard protocol To study the combined effect of sucrose and various PGR combinations on growth and multiplication of callus and biomass and alkaloid yield three concentrations of sucrose (1%, 3%, 5%) were used in this study in normal strength of agar as well as in suspension for both MS and B5 formulations. Three different combinations of PGR s used were ( The biomass doubling time was calculated by harvesting the suspension culture from 3 conical flasks after every 2-day interval filtered on a pre-weighed filter paper. The suspension cultures were maintained by continuous shaking at 150 RPM in a shaker incubator for 12-14 days. The suspension cultures were established and maintained for 2 cycles and sub-cultured every 12-14 days for the cell biomass harvesting and alkaloid yield. The cell biomass was harvested after 14 - days (2- weeks) by filtration on a pre-weighed filter paper (Whatman No.1). For callus culture 100ml of medium was modified for each treatment and dispensed equally in 2 culture boxes. Each culture box was inoculated with 4 - leaf segments for callus induction or 4 - spots of 100 -150 mg of callus for sub-culture and multiplications. Hence, induction and proliferation of callus is represented by a sample size of 8 per 100ml culture medium per treatment. Callus cultures were maintained by sub-culturing every 4-weeks cycle. The friable callus at the end of second subculture was used to establish suspension culture. In suspension culture each treatment was modified for 100ml of medium and dispensed 25ml each in to 4 - conical flasks of 150ml capacity. Each 25ml of suspension medium was inoculated with 100 - 150 mg of friable callus (4 - weeks old) from agar medium or 5ml of 2 - weeks old suspension culture for biomass production. Hence, sub-culture, proliferation and biomass production in suspension culture was represented by a sample size of 4 per 100ml medium per treatment. The growth and development was measured by pooling callus from 2 culture boxes for 100ml medium, expressed in g/l and considered as first replicate. Similarly, cell biomass from 100ml of suspension medium was pooled, expressed in g/l unit and considered as first replicate. These experiments on each treatment were repeated thrice and the results represented as mean ± standard deviations. The callus grown on agar medium was harvested after 4-weeks of sub-culture. The cell biomass from suspension culture was harvested every 2- weeks of culture/sub-culture. Callus grown in each of the culture tube or culture boxes were weighed separately. The laboratory filter paper cut to the size of inner Petri-plate pair and dried in oven at 60°C for 2hrs to make the papers completely moisture free, cooled down to room temperature before weighing. To calculate callus fresh weight, the initial weight of dried filter paper was taken followed by weight of filter paper along with callus and represented as: Callus Fresh Wt = (Weight of filter paper and the callus - Initial weight of dried filter paper) To calculate dry weight, the callus along with the filter was dried by initially at room temperature for 2 - 4 days. The callus along with filter paper was further incubated at 40°C in dry heat oven for 3 - 4 hours to remove the traces of moisture before weighing for dry weight. Precaution was maintained to avoid moisture exposure of petri-pales with dried callus and the filter paper. The dried callus along with the filter paper was weighed and represented as: Callus Dry Wt = (Weight of dried callus along with filter paper - Initial weight of dried filter paper) The cell biomass growth was calculated by harvesting the suspension culture from all 4 conical flasks of a treatment after every 2-days interval onto a pre-weighed filter paper. Filter papers (Whatman No.1) were dried in oven at 60°C for 2hrs to make the papers completely moisture free, cooled down to room temperature before weighing. One of the dried filter paper discs was used to filter simple distilled water followed by keeping over three layer of blotting paper towel for 1 hr with 2-3 changes to absorb moisture. The weight of moisture free filter paper was taken. The cell biomass were harvested by pooled filtration from 100ml medium for each treatment using the pre-weighed filter paper and kept in the petri-plates over 3 layers of blotting papers towel for absorbing of moisture by changing 2-3 times with fresh towels over a period of 1 hr. To calculate cell biomass fresh weight, the weight of moisture free filter paper along with cell biomass was taken and represented as: Biomass Fresh Wt = (Weight of moisture free filter paper and the cell biomass - Initial weight of moisture free filter paper) The cell biomass was allowed to dry at room temperature for 2-3 days by shifting on a fresh blotting papers towel every day. Finally cell biomass was dried in oven at 40°C for 2-3 hr to remove the remaining moisture before weighing for dry weight. Precaution was maintained to avoid moisture exposure of petri-pales with cell biomass. The dried cell biomass was calculated as: Biomass Dry Wt = (Weight of the dried biomass with filter paper - Weight of the dried filter paper) About 20mg of dried callus or cell biomass was ground with 10ml of methanol in a mortar pestle, and the whole mixture kept overnight in 100ml conical flasks in a rotary shaker at 25 - 50 rpm for proper mixing of the solvent. The total mixture was then centrifuged at 3000 RPM for 10 minutes and about 9.0 ml of supernatant collected. The supernatant was re-centrifuged 2-3 times until a clear supernatant was obtained. Finally 7-8ml of supernatant was collected in 25ml beakers and kept for drying at room temperature. After complete evaporation of solvent (overnight) the left over content was re-dissolved in 2ml methanol (by mixing for 1hr covered with Petri-plates) and stored in 2.0ml micro-centrifuge vials for further investigations. The calibration curve was prepared with Bismuth nitrate pentahydrate (Bi(NO3)3.5H2O) stock solution. Bismuth nitrate stock solution was made by dissolving 10mg Bismuth nitrate and diluted with DDW (10mg of Bi(NO3)3.5H2O + 5ml of Conc. HNO3 + 95ml of DDW = 100ml of Bi(NO3)3.5H2O). Series dilutions of the stock solution were made by pipetting out 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 mL stock solution into separate 10mL standard flasks and diluted to volume with double distilled water. A 1mL amount of this solution was taken, and 5 mL thiourea solution (3%) was added to it. The absorbance value of the light yellow solution was measured at 435 (430) nm against the blank containing nitric acid and thiourea. The OD value against each of the concentration is presented in The total alkaloid was estimated following the modification of protocol Factor = Concentration / absorbance at 430nm or Concentration = Factor x Absorbance at 430nm The alkaloid content was represented as mg/g dry weight of callus or the cell biomass and calculated as under: Alkaloid content (mg/g dwt): {(Concentrations ((µg) / 10mg Dry weight} x 1000 It is defined as the alkaloid content per litre of the culture establishment. It is calculated as: Alkaloid Production (mg/l) = Dry wt (g/l) x Alkaloid content (mg/g) The rate of production of alkaloid per litre per day is the productivity of system (treatment). It is calculated as Alkaloid Productivity (mg/l/day) = {Alkaloid Production (mg/l) / no. of days the product is harvested} The yield of the alkaloid per treatment is represented as the percentage of alkaloid per gram dry weight of the callus or the cell biomass produced. It is calculated as Alkaloid Yield (% dwt) = {Alkaloid Content (mg/g) / 1000} x 100 The mean of three replicates of experiments, standard deviation, monovariate and multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA and MANOVA) of results were performed by using SPSS 15 package for Window (SPSS Inc., USA) in the present study.
Results
Both axillary buds and shoot tip explants were found difficult for successful establishment of cultures due to high contamination (100%) by endophytic fungus The growth rate in suspension culture was calculated by harvesting cell biomass after every 2-day interval over a period of 1 month. The fresh weight of biomass growth calculated for 4-flasks was represented as mg/100ml suspension culture medium as shown in All the observable response of fresh wt., dry wt., alkaloid content, production, productivity and the yield showed different pattern in two different physical state (agar and suspension) of the medium irrespective of MS or the B5 nutrient formulation ( (Agar (1%) solidified MS medium prepared in the above strength (concentrations) were added with 3% sucrose (w/v) and modified with 0.5 mg/l of 2,4-D + 1.0 mg/l of KIN + 2.0 mg/l of NAA. About 100-150 mg callus was inoculated per culture vessel and the growth was recorded after 4- weeks of sub-culture). (MS suspension medium prepared in the above strength (concentrations) were added with 3% sucrose (w/v) and modified with 0.5 mg/l of 2,4-D + 1.0 mg/l of KIN + 2.0 mg/l of NAA. About 100-150 mg of callus/ cell biomass was inoculated per culture vessel and the biomass growth was recorded after 2- weeks of sub-culture). (Agar (1%) solidified B5 medium prepared in the above strength (concentrations) were added with 3% sucrose (w/v) and modified with 0.5 mg/l of 2,4-D + 1.0 mg/l of KIN + 2.0 mg/l of NAA. About 100-150 mg of callus was inoculated per culture vessel and the growth was recorded after 4- weeks of subculture.) (B5 suspension medium prepared in the above strength (concentrations) were added with 3% sucrose (w/v) and modified with 0.5 mg/l of 2,4-D + 1.0 mg/l of KIN + 2.0 mg/l of NAA. About 100-150 mg of callus/ cell biomass was inoculated per culture vessel and the biomass growth was recorded after 2- weeks of sub-culture). (Normal strength MS agar solidified medium was prepared containing different sucrose (w/v) concentrations and modified with (A) 0.1 mg/l of 2,4-D + 0.5 mg/l of KIN + 1.0 mg/l of NAA (B) 0.5 mg/l of 2,4-D + 1.0 mg/l of KIN + 2.0 mg/l of NAA and (C) 1.0 mg/l of 2,4-D + 2.0 mg/l of KIN + 4.0 mg/l of NAA. About 100-150 mg of callus was inoculated per culture vessel and the callus growth was recorded after 4 - weeks of sub-culture. Data represent the mean values of 3 replicates of experiments ± standard deviations). In The fresh and dry weight of the cell biomass was reduced 2-3 times in suspension condition when compared to agar solidified medium of both the nutrient (B5 and MS) formulation ( Strength of the medium played a significant role with maximum response of all the observable parameters in normal strength and least response in half strength suspension culture ( The culture production conditions of Egyptian henbane had shown that full strength MS medium as the best suited for callus and metabolites production These findings corroborated with the findings where cytokinin in B5 media was found to very helpful in increasing the total alkaloid content in The result of different concentrations of sucrose (1%, 3% and 5%) along with three variable combinations of PGR’s in MS agar medium is shown in These results confirm that induction, growth, multiplications and alkaloid production from callus culture of The effect of different combination permutations of sucrose and PGR’s in MS suspension medium on biomass and alkaloid production is presented in Amongst the two physical states of media, MS nutrient salts in suspension condition produced enhanced amount of alkaloid content, productivity and the yield despite the compromised fresh and dry wt of biomass as compared to agar solidified medium. Additionally, cell biomass culture cycle in suspension medium required just half the time (14-days) compared to callus multiplication cycle (28-days) in agar solidified medium (see footnotes of Sucrose at 3% was beneficial in the production of ajamalicine and catharanthine from immobilized cells of
Sl. No.
Media Strength
Callus Fresh wt
Callus Dry wt
Alkaloid Content
Alkaloid Production
Alkaloid Productivity
Alkaloid Yield
g/l
g/l
mg/g dwt
mg/l
mg/l/d
% dwt
1
0.50
30.400 ± 4.331
3.042 ± 0.373
1.785 ± 0.147
5.396 ± 0.293
0.193 ± 0.011
0.179 ± 0.015
2
1.00
50.000 ± 2.425
5.230 ± 0.120
2.411 ± 0.262
12.595 ± 1.227
0.450 ± 0.044
0.241 ± 0.026
3
1.50
49.400 ± 2.905
5.108 ± 0.273
2.453 ± 0.115
12.545 ± 1.195
0.448 ± 0.043
0.245 ± 0.012
F(2, 6)
33.805
59.755
12.128
51.146
50.590
12.133
P<0.05
0.001
0.000
0.008
.000
0.000
0.008
Sl. No.
Media Strength
Biomass Fresh wt
Biomass Dry wt
Alkaloid Content
Alkaloid Production
Alkaloid Productivity
Alkaloid Yield
g/l
g/l
mg/g dwt
mg/l
mg/l/d
% dwt
1
0.50
10.200 ± 0.144
1.153 ± 0.119
4.793 ± 0.311
5.546 ± 0.902
0.396 ± 0.064
0.479 ± 0.031
2
1.00
19.400 ± 0.262
2.070 ± 0.108
6.021 ± 0.351
12.451 ± 0.627
0.889 ± 0.045
0.602 ± 0.035
3
1.50
19.480 ± 0.560
2.010 ± 0.075
5.844 ± 0.231
11.761 ± 0.904
0.840 ± 0.065
0.584 ± 0.024
F(2, 6)
635.286
75.216
14.548
64.323
64.149
14.351
P<0.05
0.000
0.000
0.005
.000
0.000
0.005
Sl. No.
Media Strength
Callus Fresh wt
Callus Dry wt
Alkaloid Content
Alkaloid Production
Alkaloid Productivity
Alkaloid Yield
g/l
g/l
mg/g dwt
mg/l
mg/l/d
% dwt
1
0.50
33.267 ± 2.053
3.242 ± 0.066
2.140 ± 0.185
6.930 ± 0.465
0.247 ± 0.016
0.214 ± 0.019
2
1.00
52.267 ± 2.641
5.450 ± 0.313
2.709 ± 0.057
14.769 ± 1.040
0.527 ± 0.037
0.271 ± 0.006
3
1.50
53.267 ± 1.501
5.521 ± 0.154
2.507 ± 0.097
13.838 ± 0.632
0.494 ± 0.023
0.251 ± 0.009
F(2,6)
85.045
120.057
16.017
97.465
99.465
15.934
P<0.05
0.000
0.000
0.004
.000
0.000
0.004
Sl. No.
Media Strength
Biomass Fresh wt
Biomass Dry wt
Alkaloid Content
Alkaloid Production
Alkaloid Productivity
Alkaloid Yield
g/l
g/l
mg/g dwt
mg/l
mg/l/d
% dwt
1
0.50
10.560 ± 0.655
1.223 ± 0.060
5.101 ± 0.424
6.225 ± 0.378
0.445 ± 0.027
0.510 ± 0.043
2
1.00
20.307 ± 0.361
2.129 ± 0.079
6.203 ± 0.178
13.214 ± 0.825
0.944 ± 0.058
0.621 ± 0.018
3
1.50
20.253 ± 0.599
2.165 ± 0.075
5.970 ± 0.325
12.938 ± 1.094
0.924 ± 0.078
0.597 ± 0.032
F(2, 6)
308.481
167.032
9.600
69.794
70.130
9.578
P<0.05
0.000
0.000
0.013
.000
0.000
0.014
PGR Comb.
Sucrose Conc.
Callus Fresh wt
Callus Dry wt
Alkaloid Content
Alkaloid Production
Alkaloid Productivity
Alkaloid Yield
%
g/l
g/l
mg/g dwt
mg/l
mg/l/d
% dwt
A
1
7.393 ± 0.303
1.887 ± 0.061
1.783 ± 0.178
3.371 ± 0.440
0.120 ± 0.016
0.178 ± 0.018
A
3
38.933 ± 2.403
4.230 ± 0.083
2.709 ± 0.057
11.455 ± 0.165
0.409 ± 0.006
0.271 ± 0.006
A
5
42.067 ± 1.206
4.301 ± 0.120
2.507 ± 0.097
10.778 ± 0.445
0.385 ± 0.016
0.251 ± 0.009
B
1
33.067 ± 2.194
3.375 ± 0.174
2.079 ± 0.174
6.999 ± 0.379
0.250 ± 0.014
0.208 ± 0.018
B
3
49.133 ± 2.845
5.215 ± 0.294
3.101 ± 0.077
16.181 ± 1.249
0.578 ± 0.044
0.310 ± 0.008
B
5
45.067 ± 3.101
4.297 ± 0.163
2.873 ± 0.077
12.352 ± 0.785
0.441 ± 0.028
0.287 ± 0.008
C
1
23.800 ± 1.778
2.359 ± 0.134
2.109 ± 0.132
4.980 ± 0.520
0.178 ± 0.019
0.211 ± 0.013
C
3
47.400 ± 1.114
4.863 ± 0.264
2.829 ± 0.065
13.746 ± 0.432
0.491 ± 0.016
0.283 ± 0.006
C
5
48.533 ± 0.702
4.374 ± 0.133
2.395 ± 0.157
10.475 ± 0.699
0.374 ± 0.025
0.240 ± 0.016
Source
Dependent Variable
Type III Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Corrected Model
Biomass Fresh wt
4645.515(a)
8
580.689
150.473
.000
Biomass Dry wt
30.024(b)
8
3.753
123.527
.000
Alkaloid Content
4.520(c)
8
.565
38.367
.000
Alkaloid Production
416.568(d)
8
52.071
127.166
.000
Alkaloid Productivity
.532(d)
8
.066
127.846
.000
Alkaloid Yield
.045(c)
8
.006
38.416
.000
Intercept
Biomass Fresh wt
37496.229
1
37496.229
9716.361
.000
Biomass Dry wt
406.019
1
406.019
13363.633
.000
Alkaloid Content
167.029
1
167.029
11341.884
.000
Alkaloid Production
2720.338
1
2720.338
6643.545
.000
Alkaloid Productivity
3.468
1
3.468
6673.151
.000
Alkaloid Yield
1.670
1
1.670
11357.991
.000
PGR Comb.
Biomass Fresh wt
850.028
2
425.014
110.133
.000
Biomass Dry wt
3.053
2
1.526
50.236
.000
Alkaloid Content
.580
2
.290
19.701
.000
Alkaloid Production
50.534
2
25.267
61.707
.000
Alkaloid Productivity
.064
2
.032
61.694
.000
Alkaloid Yield
.006
2
.003
19.817
.000
Sucrose Conc.
Biomass Fresh wt
3389.780
2
1694.890
439.195
.000
Biomass Dry wt
25.046
2
12.523
412.173
.000
Alkaloid Content
3.708
2
1.854
125.898
.000
Alkaloid Production
357.128
2
178.564
436.084
.000
Alkaloid Productivity
.456
2
.228
438.790
.000
Alkaloid Yield
.037
2
.019
125.986
.000
PGR Comb. * Sucrose Conc.
Biomass Fresh wt
405.707
4
101.427
26.283
.000
Biomass Dry wt
1.926
4
.482
15.850
.000
Alkaloid Content
.232
4
.058
3.934
.018
Alkaloid Production
8.906
4
2.226
5.437
.005
Alkaloid Productivity
.011
4
.003
5.450
.005
Alkaloid Yield
.002
4
.001
3.931
.018
Error
Biomass Fresh wt
69.463
18
3.859
Biomass Dry wt
.547
18
.030
Alkaloid Content
.265
18
.015
Alkaloid Production
7.370
18
.409
Alkaloid Productivity
.009
18
.001
Alkaloid Yield
.003
18
.000
PGRComb.
Sucrose Conc.
Biomass Fresh wt
Biomass Dry wt
Alkaloid Content
Alkaloid Production
Alkaloid Productivity
Alkaloid Yield
%
g/l
g/l
mg/g dwt
mg/l
mg/l/d
% dwt
A
1
11.69 ± 0.69
1.29 ± 0.08
4.49 ± 0.27
5.78 ± 0.43
0.41 ± 0.03
0.45 ± 0.03
A
3
14.85 ±0.65
1.73 ± 0.05
5.82 ± 0.04
10.05 ± 0.28
0.72 ± 0.02
0.58 ± 0.00
A
5
15.80 ± 0.48
1.61 ± 0.04
5.46 ± 0.08
8.77 ± 0.08
0.63 ± 0.01
0.55 ± 0.01
B
1
17.68 ± 0.14
2.01 ± 0.04
5.28 ± 0.19
10.61 ± 0.53
0.76 ± 0.04
0.53 ± 0.02
B
3
18.41 ± 0.32
2.12 ± 0.13
6.00 ± 0.28
12.68 ± 0.91
0.91 ± 0.07
0.60 ± 0.03
B
5
18.35 ± 0.12
2.02 ± 0.15
5.67 ± 0.31
11.47 ± 0.98
0.82 ± 0.07
0.57 ± 0.03
C
1
13.63 ± 0.62
1.16 ± 0.08
4.61 ± 0.20
5.37 ± 0.56
0.38 ± 0.04
0.46 ± 0.02
C
3
16.80 ± 0.74
1.90 ± 0.08
6.33 ± 0.32
12.01 ± 0.87
0.86 ± 0.06
0.63 ± 0.03
C
5
16.91 ± 0.80
2.00 ± 0.06
5.15 ± 0.20
10.32 ± 0.21
0.74 ± 0.02
0.52 ± 0.02
Source
Dependent Variable
Type III Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Corrected Model
Biomass Fresh wt
123.446(a)
8
15.431
48.654
.000
Biomass Dry wt
2.828(b)
8
.354
47.076
.000
Alkaloid Content
8.996(c)
8
1.124
21.229
.000
Alkaloid Production
161.241(d)
8
20.155
52.594
.000
Alkaloid Productivity
.823(e)
8
.103
52.218
.000
Alkaloid Yield
.090(f)
8
.011
21.098
.000
Intercept
Biomass Fresh wt
6923.525
1
6923.525
21830.060
.000
Biomass Dry wt
83.544
1
83.544
11124.273
.000
Alkaloid Content
794.009
1
794.009
14989.631
.000
Alkaloid Production
2525.669
1
2525.669
6590.620
.000
Alkaloid Productivity
12.885
1
12.885
6538.928
.000
Alkaloid Yield
7.941
1
7.941
14892.169
.000
PGR Comb.
Biomass Fresh wt
73.873
2
36.937
116.462
.000
Biomass Dry wt
1.238
2
.619
82.391
.000
Alkaloid Content
.739
2
.369
6.974
.006
Alkaloid Production
54.327
2
27.164
70.883
.000
Alkaloid Productivity
.277
2
.139
70.388
.000
Alkaloid Yield
.007
2
.004
6.971
.006
Sucrose Conc.
Biomass Fresh wt
38.589
2
19.295
60.836
.000
Biomass Dry wt
1.011
2
.506
67.312
.000
Alkaloid Content
7.099
2
3.550
67.009
.000
Alkaloid Production
87.883
2
43.941
114.663
.000
Alkaloid Productivity
.449
2
.224
113.827
.000
Alkaloid Yield
.071
2
.035
66.515
.000
PGR Comb. * Sucrose Conc.
Biomass Fresh wt
10.984
4
2.746
8.658
.000
Conclusion
In the present study we concluded that there exist a strong interaction of PGR’s and sucrose concentrations for the induction, growth and multiplication of leaf derived callus in both MS agar and suspension medium. Further, the physical state of the medium (agar solidified and liquid suspension) played an important role on all the observable parameter of fresh wt and dry wt as well as alkaloid content, production, productivity and yield. The standard culture conditions induced considerable amount of variations in total alkaloid production from callus grown on agar medium and the cell biomass in suspension of The financial support provided by University Grant Commission, New Delhi for the major research project (F.: 42-207/2013 (SR) for the period 1.4.2013-31.3.2017) to the corresponding author is gratefully acknowledged. All the authors are grateful to Dr. K. V. Chaitanya for his critical review and editing of the manuscript.