Abstract
Lead removal efficiency of the bacterial strain,
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2020
Gupta Shivani, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Heavy metals employed in industries are hazardous to human beings and other organisms. A sudden boost in the industrial activities has contributed quantitatively as well as qualitatively to the alarming increase in the discharge of metal pollutants into environmental sink, especially the aqueous environment Lead is a well-known metal for its extensive industrial applications which is in the environment at the end of the industrial processes such as metal finishing, metallurgical work, electroplating, chemical manufacturing, mining, paint production and battery manufacturing. Overall, only a small amount of lead is present in the environment naturally. But, the level is elevated only because of human activities Several traditional practices such as ion exchange, filtration, evaporation, solvent extraction, electrochemical treatment, reverse osmosis, chemical precipitation and chemical oxidation or reduction are used to eliminate the toxic heavy metals dissolved in the industrial effluents. All these above mentioned processes are either very much expensive or not that much effective in removal process, in particular when the metal concentration is in the range of 1-100 mg/l in the waste water. An additional drawback of the traditional methods is the fabrication of more amount of toxic chemical sludge and its consequent disposal or treatment being further luxurious and also not environmental friendly After several scientific investigations, bioremediation or biosorption technique has been concluded as a natural process and also cost effective. It has several advantages such as low operating cost, minimum ratio of disposable sludge volume, high efficiency in detoxifying very dilute effluents, multiple heavy metals uptake at a time, cheaper production of biomass, treatment of large volumes of waste water and even Microorganisms present in the metal polluted environment naturally develop the resistance against the toxicity of existing heavy metals
Materials And Methods
Various concentrations of lead were prepared by dissolving lead acetate [(CH3COO)2Pb.3H2O] in sterile distilled water. The bacterial strain The maximum concentration of lead allowing bacterial growth was determined in nutrient agar (peptic digest of animal tissue-0.5g, beef extract-0.15g, yeast extract-0.15g, sodium chloride-0.5g and agar-1.5g in 100 ml of distilled water) having 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 ppm of lead. Growth was observed after incubating the plates for 24 hrs at 37°C. The organism from the overnight culture maintained in nutrient broth (peptic digest of animal tissue-0.5g, beef extract-0.15g, yeast extract-0.15g and sodium chloride-0.5g in 100 ml of distilled water) was inoculated (109 cells) into minimalbroth (dipotassium hydrogen phosphate-0.7g, potassium dihydrogen phosphate-0.2g, glucose-0.1g, sodium citrate-0.05g and magnesium sulphate-0.1g in 100 ml of distilled water) containing different concentrations of lead (200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 ppm). The culture flasks incubated on a shaker for intermittent mixing were maintained at room temperature. The samples from these flasks were taken after every two days up to ten days and were subjected to AAS analysis for determining the residual lead concentration. From each concentration ten ml sample was taken and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for fifteen minutes. The supernatant was taken in an eppendorf tube and subjected to Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometric (AAS) analysis (Model: MSA030351; Thermo Fisher Scientific Ltd., India) and the readings were recorded. After centrifugation pellet was collected and dried in a hot air oven at 80°C for 3 hrs. The final dry weight was taken to calculate the biomass. For obtaining immobilized cells, the seed culture of the bacterium was grown in nutrient broth and the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for twenty minutes. The cells were washed and suspended in 0.1% NaCl. Then 3.5% of sodium alginate was added to the cell suspension and mixed thoroughly without forming any air bubble in the slurry. The slurry containing cells was extended as drops through a tube (2mm diameter) into 4% CaCl2 solution. The drops formed into spherical beads of 2mm size. The gel beads were kept in 4% CaCl2 solution, at 5°C for about an hour for complete gelation For comparing the efficiency of biosorption of live, dead and immobilized cells, 100 ml minimal broth with 1000 ppm of lead in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks was used. These flasks were inoculated with these cell types individually (109 cells for live and dead cells and ten beads for immobilized cells as inoculum volume). Samples were taken from these flasks after every 30 minutes upto 150 mins. Samples were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for fifteen minutes and the clean supernatant was used for AAS analysis (Model: MSA030351; Thermo Fisher Scientific Ltd., India). The readings represented the mean of residual concentration of lead in solution. By supplementing different carbon sources like dextrose, fructose, glucose, lactose and sucrose at 10% concentration in minimal broth having 1000 ppm lead and the inoculum (109cells), the efficiency of the bacterial strain for the removal of lead was also determined. The flasks were incubated at 37°C on a shaker for six days and the samples were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 15 mins. The pellets were dried in a hot air oven at 80°C for 3 hrs and the biomass was estimated. Two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out for the factors, residual lead concentration, percent removal of lead and biomass of Lead uptake by the bacterium was calculated using the following mass balance equation Q = [V (Ci-Cf)]/S (eq. 1) Where, q = lead uptake (mg metal/g cell dry weight); V = volume of metal-bearing solution contacted with the bacterium (L); Ci = initial concentration of metal in solution (mg/L); Cf= final concentration of metal in solution (mg/L); S = dry weight of bacterial cells added (g). Freundlich The classical Freundlich equation is given below: q = KfCe1/n (eq. 2) Where, q = heavy metal adsorbed on the bacterium (mg/g dry weight); Ce = final concentration of metal (mg/L) in the solution; Kf= an empirical constant that provides an indication of the adsorption capacity of biosorbent; n = an empirical constant that provides an indication of the intensity of adsorption. Equation Log q = log Kf + (1/n) log Ce (eq. 3) The adsorption constants, Kfand 1/n were determined by plotting log q as a function of log Ce. The classical Langmuir equation is given below: q = (Qmax b Ce)/ (1+ b Ce) (eq.4) Where, q = heavy metal adsorbed on the bacterium (mg/g dry weight); Ce = final concentration of metal (mg/L) in the solution; Qmax= maximum possible amount of metallic ion adsorbed per unit weight of bacterial cells; b = equilibrium constant related to the affinity of the binding sites for the metals. Equation 1/q = (1/qmax) + (1/qmaxb) (1/Ce) (eq.5) The adsorption constants (Qmaxand b) were obtained by plotting 1/q as a function of 1/Ce.
Results
The bacterial strain, The residual concentrations of lead after treatment with The residual concentrations of lead after treatment with The influence of various sugars at 10% concentration on the biomass of Two way analysis of variance for the factor, residual concentration of lead with the variables, treatment period and lead concentration indicated that the variations in residual concentration of lead due to treatment period and lead concentration were not statistically significant at 5% level. The variations in residual concentration of lead due to cell types were not significant at 5% level but significant due to treatment period. The variations in the biomass (g/ml) of The variation in percent removal of lead due to cell types was not statistically significant at 5% level but significant due to treatment period. The variation in percent removal of lead due to lead concentration was not statistically significant at 5% level but significant due to treatment period ( The Freundlich adsorption isotherms for lead biosorption by
Treatment period
Lead concentration (ppm)
(days)
200
400
600
800
1000
2
1.559
0.114
0.061
0.046
0.137
4
0.190
0.200
0.524
0.540
0.265
6
0.244
0.031
0.361
1.532
0.078
8
0.730
0.220
0.808
0.894
0.833
10
0.967
0.158
0.486
1.583
0.428
Treatment period
Cell types
(minutes)
Live
Autoclaved
Immobilized
30
44.621
12.871
0.374
60
51.911
27.417
14.616
90
40.494
13.619
8.718
120
20.989
19.471
12.852
150
28.100
14.732
11.959
Factor
Source of variation
Calculated F value
F table value at 5% level
Level ofsignificance
Residual concentration of lead
lead concentration
0.84
3
Not significant (P>0.05)
treatment period
2.51
3
Not significant (P>0.05)
Residual concentration of lead
cell types
0.95
3.83
Not significant (P>0.05)
treatment period
11.27
4.45
Significant(P<0.05)
Biomass(g/ml) of
lead concentration
48.8
3
Significant(P<0.05)
treatment period
8.46
3
Significant(P<0.05)
Percent removal of lead
lead concentration
0.66
3
Not significant (P>0.05)
treatment period
5.09
3
Significant(P<0.05)
Percent removal of lead
cell types
0.95
3.83
Not significant (P>0.05)
treatment period
11.27
4.45
Significant(P<0.05)
Treatment Period (days)
Isotherm constants
2
Freundlich
R2
0.673
Kf
17.78
1/n
-0.445
Langmuir
R2
0.588
Qmax (mg/g)
1000
b (L/mg)
-0.001
4
Freundlich
R2
0.443
Kf
25.12
1/n
0.364
Langmuir
R2
0.510
Qmax (mg/g)
50
b (L/mg)
0.035
6
Freundlich
R2
0.071
Kf
1.413
1/n
0.176
Langmuir
R2
0.001
Qmax (mg/g)
16.66
b (L/mg)
-3.450
8
Freundlich
R2
0.076
Kf
133.4
1/n
0.287
Langmuir
R2
0.117
Qmax (mg/g)
161.29
b (L/mg)
0.044
10
Freundlich
R2
0.009
Kf
5.623
1/n
-0.017
Langmuir
R2
0.009
Qmax (mg/g)
71.42
b (L/mg)
0.079
Discussion
Even low levels of lead can cause permanent damage in organisms. The immediate measure to prevent lead poisoning is to avoid exposure to lead. Removal of the source of lead is critical to reducing lead levels. Biosorption is an alternative to traditional physico-chemical means for removing toxic metals from ground waters and waste waters. Removal of lead from solution was studied using growing cells and washed cells of When different concentrations of lead were tested, the strain With different concentrations of lead, the biomass (g/ml) of In the present study, supplementation of different sugars (Dextrose, fructose, glucose, lactose and sucrose) indicated that dextrose, fructose and glucose were efficiently utilized by The biosorption isotherm curve denotes the equilibrium distribution of metal ions between the aqueous and solid phases. The equilibrium distribution is very essential in finding out the highest biosorption potential. Various isotherm models are used to portray this equilibrium distribution. Langmuir and Freundlich models are extensively used in equilibrium analysis to analyse the mechanism of sorption
Conclusion
Bioremediation is the major reason for the disappearance of these heavy metals from contaminated sites. However, the process is influenced by various environmental conditions like pH and temperature. The studies so far carried out suggest that The authors thank the authorities of the American College, Madurai for the facilities and Tamil Nadu State Council for Science and Technology (TNSCST) Chennai for the financial assistance.