Abstract
The Fall armyworm worm (FAW) (Spodopterafrugiperda) is one of the important economic pests which goes on several field crops and causes serious damage. The aim of this study was to look for efficient, less cost and environmentally friend plant extract for controlling Fall armyworm worm in cereal crops. A Complete Randomized Block Design (CRBD) experiments with three replications were conducted in the laboratory to investigate the insecticidal effects of four plant extracts consisting of ethanolic extract of Neem (Azadirachta indica) seeds, Black pepper (Piper nigrum) seeds, Usher (Calotropis procera ) leaves and water extracts of Argel (Solenostemma argel) leaves on larvae of the Fall armyworm (FAW) (Spodoptera frugiperda). Newly emerged larvae of FAW were treated topically by 4 concentrations (10, 25, 50 and 75%) of each extract, and then the larval mortalities were calculated after 24, 48 and72 hrs. The results showed the highest concentrations (75%) of the three ethanolic extracts gave higher mortality percentages (100%) after 72 hrs of exposure, compared with other concentrations. Also, these were not significantly different from the recommended dose of the standard pesticide Spinosad . On the other hand, Argel water extract showed no effect on the (FAW) larvae. It is recommended that this experiment to be replicated under different environments.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2021
Elsheikh M. Kona Nada, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
The Fall Army Worm (FAW), FAW was first detected in Central and West Africa in the early 2016, and further reported and confirmed in the whole mainland of Southern Africa Due to the problems and hazards arising from the application of inorganic insecticides to control FAW, nowadays organic insecticides are used. However, many studies to control FAW were carried out using plant extracts. The earlier studies have evaluated the control of FAW in Maize in screenhouse and open field experiments in Malawi and Nepal using plant extracts like Nicotiana tabacum, hot pepper, Artemesia, Cymbopogon citratus, Azadirachta indica and Lippia javanica (2015, 2019, 2020)
Materials And Methods
Experiments were conducted in the laboratory of the College of Agricultural Studies - Sudan University of Science&Technology, Shambat, Khartoum- Sudan during 2018-2019,where the extracts of four plants, Neen ( Neem seeds, Black pepper seeds and Usher leave powder extracts were prepared by using Ethanol according to the method described by Sukhdev et al. (2008) Moreover, aqueous extraction was also carried out according to the method of For preparing laboratory bioassays, four groups, each of 15 recently hatched larvae of (FAW) were placed in Petri-dishes, each contained a piece of fresh maize leaf which previously immersed for 5 seconds in each of the four different concentrations (10, 25, 50 and 75%) of each extract. Another group, of 15 larvae, was used as a control with each concentration, and was placed in a Petri-dish contained fresh maize leaf, treated with Ethanol, and with distilled water with Argel extract. A group of 15 larvae was added to each replicate, and was treated with the recommended dose of a standard pesticide, Spinosad (Tracer Spinosad, Chemimport Company Ltd, Sudan). The experiments were arranged in a complete randomized block design experiment (CRBD), and the test containers were kept in the laboratory, at a temperature of (27±2)
Results
In this study the bioassay tests showed the ethanolic extracts of the three plant species, the Neem, Black Pepper and Usher, were effective against the FAW larvae. The extensive studies carried out during the last decades proved the potential of plant extracts as alternative insect pest control agents Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at P≤0.05. Means between brackets are transformed by (√ × + 0.5). Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at P≤0.05Means between brackets are transformed by (√ × + 0.5) Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at P≤0.05Means between brackets are transformed by (√ × + 0.5) Considering The above The results of bioassay tests of Usher leaves extract shown in On the other hand, the results of Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at P≤0.05Means between brackets are transformed by (√ × + 0.5) The present study is the first one that indicated the effectiveness of three plants’ extracts against FAW in Sudan. The results obtained by their highest concentrations after 72 hours were comparable to that of the standard insecticide Spinosad. The strong insecticidal activity of Spinosad against many insect pests, particularly of Lepidoptera, was reported in previous studies by Salgado The extensive studies carried out during the last decades proved the potential of plant extracts as alternative insect pest control agents Based on the results of the present study,which showed the equal efficacy of the plant extracts and the pesticide Spinosad, it is worth considering the costs of the FAW control by each group, and the impact on the Environment. The price of “100 ml of Spinosad” in the Pesticide Market in Khartoum State equals to 750 SDG, while the price of one Pound of Black pepper in the local market is equal to 500 SDG. In comparison, Tens of Kgs of Neem seeds, or of Usher leaves, can be collected “free of charge “at any time from the open fields in Khartoum State.
Concentrations
No. of Larvae
After 24hrs
After 48hrs
After 72hrs
No. of dead Larvae
Mean %Mortality
No. of dead Larvae
Mean %Mortality
No. of dead Larvae
Mean %Mortality
10%
15
2 (1.6)
13.6 (3.8) c
5 (2.3)
33.3(5.8) b
10 (3.2)
66.6(8.2)ab
25%
15
4 (2.1)
26.33 (|5.1) b
6 (2.5)
40(6.4) b
9 (3.1)
60(7.8)ab
50%
15
4 (2.1)
26.33(5.1) b
6 (2.5)
40(6.4) b
9 (3.1)
60(7.8)a b
75%
15
12 (3.5)
80 (9.0) a
14 (3.7)
93.3(9.7) a
15 (3.9)
100(10.02) a
(Standard)
15
10 (3.2)
66.6 (8.2)a
14 (3.9)
93.3(9.7) a
15 (3.9)
100(10.02)a
Control
15
0 (0.7)
0 (0.07) d
0 (0.7)
0 (0.7) c
0 (0.7)
0(0.07)b
AConcentrations
No. of Larvae
After 24hrs
After 48hrs
After 72hrs
No. of dead Larvae
Mean %Mortality
No. of dead Larvae
Mean %Mortality
No. of dead Larvae
Mean %Mortality
10%
15
3(1.7)
20(4.5)bc
6 (2.5)
40(6.4) b
15(3.9)
100(10.0) a
25%
15
1(1.1)
6.6(8.2)bc
9 (3.1)
60(7.8)ab
14(3.8)
93.3(9.7) a
50%
15
5(2.3)
33.3(5.8)ab
10(3.2)
66.6(8.2)ab
15(3.9)
100(10.0)a
75%
15
3(1.7)
20(4.5)bc
6 (2.5)
40(6.4) b
15(3.9)
100(10.0) a
(Standard)
15
9(3.1)
60(7.8) a
11(3.4)
73.3(8.6)a
15(3.9)
100(10.0) a
Control
15
0 (0.7)
0(0.07) c
0 (0.7)
0(0.07) c
0 (0.7)
0(0.07)b
Cocentrations
No. of Larvae
After 24hrs
After 48hrs
After 72hrs
No. of dead Larvae
Mean%Mortality
No. of dead Larvae
Mean%Mortality
No. of dead Larvae
Mean%Mortality
10%
15
3(1.7)
20(4.2) b
6 (2.5)
40(6.4)a
15(3.9)
100(10.0)a
25%
15
1(1.1)
6.66(8.2) b
9 (3.1)
60(7.8)a
14(3.8)
100(10.0)a
50%
15
5(2.3)
33.3(5.8) ab
10(3.2)
66.6(8.2)a
15(3.9)
100(10.0)a
75%
15
7 (2.7)
64(8.0) a
10(3.2)
66.6(8.2)a
15(3.9)
100(10.0)a
(Standard)
15
9(3.1)
60(7.8)a
11(3.4)
73.3(8.6)a
15(3.9)
100(10.0)a
Control
15
0 (0.7)
0a(0.07)b
0 (0.7)
0(0.07)b
0 (0.7)
0(0.07)b
Concentrations
No. of Larvae
After 24hrs
After 48hrs
After 72 hrs
No. of dead Larvae
Mean%Mortality
No. of dead Larvae
Mean%Mortality
No. of dead Larvae
Mean%Mortality
10%
15
0 (0.7)
0(0.07) b
0 (0.7)
0(0.07) b
1 (1.1)
6.66(2.6)b
25%
15
0 (0.7)
0(0.07)b
1 (1.1)
6.7(2.6)b
2 (1.6)
13.3(3.8) b
50%
15
1 (1.1)
6.66(2.6)b
1 (1.1)
6.7(2.6)b
3 (1.7)
20(4.5)b
75%
15
0 (0.7)
0(0.07)b
0 (0.7)
0(0.07)b
1 (1.1)
6.66(2.6)b
(Standard)
15
10 (3.2)
66.6(2.6)a
13 (3.7)
86.6(9.5)a
15 (3.9)
100(10.0)a
Control
15
0 (0.7)
0(0.7)b
0 (0.7)
0(0.7)b
0 (0.7)
0(0.7)b
Conclusion
Many studies proved the efficacy of plant extracts against a number of economically important pests worldwide. This study also showed the efficacy of the extracts of three plants (Neem, Black pepper and Usher) against the larvae of FAW. Furthermore, this study proved that plant extracts are more economic and environmentally safe compared to synthetic pesticides. Therefore, the study recommends more studies to explore the potentiality of other indigenous plants which can save the hard currency and reduce the environmental hazards.