Abstract
Experiments were conducted to evaluate the response of different sorghum varieties to micro-dosing fertilization strategies on yield and yield traits, as well as the impact on nitrogen fertilizer and water use efficiency (NUE and WUE). In addition, the benefit-cost ratio of sorghum cultivation under different fertilization strategies in the Sudan savanna zone of Nigeria was analyzed. The experiment included eight fertilizer micro-application strategies as well as two control and three sorghum varieties. Our results showed that most agronomic indicators differed significantly between years, varieties, and fertilization strategies. However, the application of 100g hill-1 poultry manure plus 3g NPK hill-1 resulted in the highest average grain yield > 2000 kg ha-1 at both study sites (BUK and Minjibir). This means that the grain yield is 86% and 132% higher than the average grain yield with zero fertilization. There were extremely significant differences between NUE and WUE fertilization strategies and varieties at the two sites. At BUK and Minjibir, NPK applied with 3 g of hill-1 had the highest NUE with an average of 37.6 and 40 kg grain/kg N. Application of 100 g of poultry manure plus 3g of NPK hill-1 resulted in the highest average WUE of 6.1 and 5.6 kg grain/mm for BUK and Minjibir, respectively. BUK (3.2) and Minjibir (3.6) had the highest net income and benefit-to-cost ratios when applying 3 grams of NPK per hill. The adoption of micro-dosing fertilization strategies by smallholder farmers provides a good opportunity to prevent long-term soil fertility limitations and thereby increase sorghum productivity and farmer incomes by recommending multiple-choice fertilization strategies for improved sorghum varieties.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2024
A. Ajeigbe Hakeem, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. However, there is no conflict of interest among the authors of the manuscript.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Sorghum ( Many smallholder farmers in tropical Africa rarely use inorganic fertilizers to grow food crops such as sorghum due to the high cost of fertilizer purchase and application labour Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in crops is a very complex phenomenon determined by the economic production of a species (cereal, feed, or dual use) and is defined as the amount of biomass and/or grain produced per unit of available nitrogen in the crop. Using micro-dosing application technology, a field trial of 10 fertilization strategies using organic fertilizers, inorganic fertilizer sources, and their combinations was conducted with 2 improved
Materials And Methods
The experiments were conducted over three growing seasons (2016-2018) at two locations within the Sudan savanna agroecological zone of Nigeria. The first location was the ICRISAT research field situated within the Institute for Agricultural Research (IAR) Station, Wasai, Minjibir (Latitude 12.17° N and Longitude 8.65° E). The second location was the ICRISAT research field situated within Bayero University Kano (BUK) (Latitude 12.98° N and Longitude 9.75° E). Weather data was collected from Campbell Scientific Automated Weather Stations installed within a 2 km radius of the experiment sites. The experimental design was a split-split plot with four replications. The year of the experiment was taken as the main plot, fertilizer application strategy as the sub-plot and the sorghum varieties tested the sub-sub-plot. The years of the experiment considered as the main plot were Year 1 (2016), Year 2 (2017), and Year 3 (2018), respectively. The fertilizer sources (organic and inorganic), application strategies (sole and combination), and varying quantities considered as sub-plots are nine fertilizer application strategies and a control (no fertilizer) applied using micro-dossing techniques. The fertilization treatments ( Hill refers to a hole. Soil samples were taken annually at random before the establishment of the experiment at three different depths of 0-20 cm, 20-40 cm, and 40-60 cm, respectively, and analyzed for soil Physico-chemical properties. Organic manure (cattle and poultry) used in the experiment was also analyzed annually for their chemical properties such as total N, available P, exchangeable cations, percentage of organic carbon, and pH before being used for the experiment. The fields were ploughed, disc-harrowed, and ridged at 75 cm inter-row spacing. Sowing was done during the first cropping season on the 18th and 21st of June 2016 at BUK and Minjibir, respectively. In the second cropping season, it was done on the 28th of June at BUK and the 20th of June at Minjibir in 2017. The third cropping season was sown on the 27th of June at BUK and the 20th of June at Minjibir in 2018. Seeds were sown at 5-7 seeds per hole at a depth of 3 cm to 5 cm and thinned to 2 plants per hill at 2-3 weeks after sowing (WAS). To maintain optimum plant population, where necessary, gap filling was done 3 to 4 days after sowing. For the plots with organic fertilizers, all the fertilizers were applied in full at 5 cm from the seed at sowing. For those plots with inorganic fertilizer, micro-doses were applied 5 cm away from the seed at sowing, except for the plots with NPK at the rate of 80:60:60 on which the full doses of P and K together with 60 kg N ha-1 were applied through drilling at sowing, while the balance of 20 kg N ha-1 was applied as Urea at 5 WAS. Weeding was done manually to keep the field weed-free. At both experimental locations, grain and stalk yields were measured from two harvested rows (net plot) at the center of each plot [7.5 m2 area (5 m × 1.5 m)]. Panicles, grain, and stalk were sun-dried for two weeks before threshing. Grain yield (kg ha−1) and 1000 seed weight (g) were determined. All the data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the GENSTAT analytical tool (19th edition). Year; fertilizer type, combination, quantities; and variety were taken as factors to determine the level of significance at 5% probability. Fisher s least-significant difference (LSD) was computed where the p values were significant at the p = 0.05 level of probability Water use efficiencies of grain for the years of experiment, fertilizer micro-dose application strategies, and the tested varieties between sowing and physiological maturity were calculated. Firstly, we compute daily reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) using the daily records of minimum temperature. The recommended crop coefficient (Kc) for sorghum was calculated using the methods described by ETc = Kc ETo (1) where, ETc crop evapotranspiration (mm), Kc crop coefficient (dimensionless), ETo reference crop evapotranspiration (mm d-1). WUE was calculated using the following equations by WUE = where, GY is grain yield (kg ha−1), ETc is crop evapotranspiration (mm). The nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was calculated as per the following formula described by NUE= where, Yf is grain yield (kg ha−1) in the fertilized plot, Yc is grain yield (kg ha−1) in the control plot, Na is nitrogen applied (kg ha-1). For the benefit-cost ratio, the methods described by Total Revenue (TR) = where Rg is the revenue generated from grain, Rs is the revenue generated from the stalk. Total Cost of Production (CP) is the sum of the costs incurred during the production of the sorghum, such as tillage, planting, crop treatments, herbicides, seeds, and labor, among others. Net economic returns (NERs) are the difference between TR and TCP. The benefit-cost ratio was therefore calculated using the below formula: B:C = TR is the total revenue generated from grain and stalk (Naira ha-1), TCP is the total cost of production of the sorghum (Naira ha-1).
F1
Control
F2
Cattle manure 50g/hill + Poultry manure 50g/hill
2.22 t/ha each
F3
Cattle manure 100g/hill
4.44 t/ha
F4
NPK broadcast/drilled
NPK 80:60:60
F5
NPK 3g/hill
NPK 15:15:15 (0.133 t/ha)
F6
NPK 3g/hill + Cattle manure 100g/hill
Cattle manure 4.44 t/ha
F7
Poultry manure 100g/hill
Poultry manure 4.44 t/ha
F8
Poultry manure 100g/hill + NPK 3g/hill
Poultry manure 4.44 t/ha + NPK 15:15:15 (0.133 t/ha)
F9
Poultry manure 150g/hill
Poultry manure 6.66 t /ha
F10
Poultry manure 50g/hill
Poultry manure 2.22 t /ha
Results
The soil types in the experimental sites ( NB: N- Nitrogen, P- Phosphorus, K-Potassium, OC- organic carbon, Ca- Calcium, Mg-Magnesium, CEC- Cation Exchangeable Carbon NB: N- Nitrogen, P- Phosphorus, K-Potassium, OC- organic carbon, Ca- Calcium, Mg-Magnesium, CEC- Cation Exchangeable Carbon The cattle manure employed ( NB: N- Nitrogen, P- Phosphorus, K-Potassium, OC- organic carbon, Ca- Calcium, Mg-Magnesium, CEC- Cation Exchangeable Carbon NPK- Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium The rainfall was highly variable and followed a single-modal pattern, but a slight drop was observed in July due to a long dry spell in 2016 and 2018 at BUK in 2018 and an early pick of rainfall observed in 2016 and 2017 in Minjibir. More precipitation was received in 2016 and 2017 at Minjibir than it was in BUK, except for 2018 when the precipitation recorded at BUK was higher than at Minjibir. Despite the volume of precipitation received in both experimental sites, most of the precipitation was of short duration and high intensity between June and August, with over 70% of the total precipitation in BUK and 77%-82% of the total precipitation in Minjibir. The total annual rainfall volume received during the experimental periods at the BUK and Minjibir sites was between 439 mm and 573 mm, which is greater than the water requirement for optimal yield of sorghum in the semi-arid region F1 (Control); F2 (Cattle manure 50g + Poultry manure 50g); F3 (Cattle manure 100g); F4 (NPK 80:60:60); F5 (NPK 3g); F6 (NPK 3g + Cattle manure 100g); F7 (Poultry 100g); F8 (Poultry manure 100g + NPK 3g); F9 (Poultry manure 150g) and F10 (Poultry manure 50g). SED: standard error of differences of means; LSD: least significant differences of the mean (5% level); CV: coefficient of variation; , and mean significant differences at <0.01, 0.01, and 0.05 level of probability; ns: not significant. Highly significant differences (p < 0.001) in the grain yield were observed between applications of fertilizer in both locations. The application of 100 g of poultry manure plus 3 g of NPK per hill (F8) resulted in the highest average yield of 2243 kg ha-1 and 2250 kg ha-1 in BUK and Minjibir, respectively. Additionally, the effect of the year was not significant in BUK, but Minjibir had a significant interaction with the year ( F1 (Control); F2 (Cattle manure 50g + Poultry manure 50g); F3 (Cattle manure 100g); F4 (NPK 80:60:60); F5 (NPK 3g); F6 (NPK 3g + Cattle manure 100g); F7 (Poultry 100g); F8 (Poultry manure 100g + NPK 3g); F9 (Poultry manure 150g) and F10 (Poultry manure 50g). SED: standard error of differences of means and LSD: least significant differences of mean (5% level). F1 (Control); F2 (Cattle manure 50g + Poultry manure 50g); F3 (Cattle manure 100g); F4 (NPK 80:60:60); F5 (NPK 3g); F6 (NPK 3g + Cattle manure 100g); F7 (Poultry 100g); F8 (Poultry manure 100g + NPK 3g); F9 (Poultry manure 150g) and F10 (Poultry manure 50g). The application of fertilizer and the variety used had significant impacts on the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of sorghum in both locations ( F1 (Control); F2 (Cattle manure 50g + Poultry manure 50g); F3 (Cattle manure 100g); F4 (NPK 80:60:60); F5 (NPK 3g); F6 (NPK 3g + Cattle manure 100g); F7 (Poultry 100g); F8 (Poultry manure 100g + NPK 3g); F9 (Poultry manure 150g) and F10 (Poultry manure 50g). SED: standard error of differences of means; LSD: least significant differences of the mean (5% level); CV: coefficient of variation; ∗∗∗, ∗∗ and ∗ mean significant differences at <0.01, 0.01, and 0.05 level of probability; ns: not significant. TCP- Total cost of production; TR- Total revenue; NP- net profit; F1- Control; F2- Cattle manure 50g/hill + Poultry manure 50g/hill; F3 -Cattle manure 100g/hill; F4 -NPK 80:60:60; F5 -NPK 3g/hill; F6 -NPK 3g/hill + Cattle manure 100g/hill; F7 -Poultry 100g/hill; F8-Poultry manure 100g + NPK 3g/hill; F9-Poultry manure 150g/hill and F10-Poultry manure 50g/hill. Among the varieties, Improved Deko had the highest mean net profit and benefit-cost ratio while CSR 01 had the lowest. In BUK, Improved Deko had a mean NP of N241,578 and B: C of 2.6 while CSR 01 had a mean NP of N154,818, and B: C of 2.0. Similarly, at Minjibir, Improved Deko had a mean NP of N280,287 and B: C of 3.0 while the lowest mean values were produced by CSR 01 with an NP of N114,920, and B: C of 2.1. This suggests a higher return on investment by cultivating Improved Deko than other varieties (CSR 01 and local Kaura). This was attributed to the high mean grain yield produced by Improved Deko. This agrees with the findings of
pH (H2O)
5.9
6.2
7.0
5.8
6.1
7.1
5.8
6.3
7.0
pH (CaCl2)
5.0
4.9
6.8
4.4
4.3
6.8
4.5
4.2
6.5
N (g/kg)
1.8
0.7
0.1
1.1
0.7
0.1
1.4
1.4
0.1
P (mg/kg)
9.6
16.5
10.0
7.3
10.0
2.4
3.4
16.7
4.5
K(Cmol/kg)
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.8
O.C (g/kg)
5.6
5.2
0.1
3.1
7.4
0.2
5.6
3.0
0.1
Ca (cmol/kg)
3.0
6.5
1.9
2.9
4.3
2.1
4.4
2.9
2.1
Mg (cmol/kg)
7.4
1.6
1.4
10.3
1.2
2.0
11.5
1.3
2.1
CEC (cmol/kg)
15.3
10.0
4.2
17.9
7.2
4.6
20.9
5.0
5.2
SAND (%)
78
78
82
74
76
78
66
74
76
SILT (%)
11
14
10
9
14
12
9
12
12
CLAY (%)
11
8
8
17
10
10
25
14
12
Texture
Sandy loam
Sandy loam
Loamy sand
Sandy loam
Sandy loam
Sandy loam
Sandy Clay loam
Sandy loam
Sandy loam
pH (H2O)
6.4
6.2
6.1
6.2
6.1
6.2
5.8
6.3
6.5
pH (CaCl2)
5.1
4.9
6.0
4.8
4.3
5.9
4.7
4.2
6.2
N (g/kg)
1.1
0.7
0.1
1.8
0.7
0.1
1.4
1.4
0.1
P (mg/kg)
12.6
16.5
12.2
5.6
10.0
9.4
5.8
16.7
2.3
K(Cmol/kg)
0.1
0.3
0.8
0.1
0.3
0.9
0.1
0.2
0.7
O.C (g/kg)
3.4
5.2
0.3
2.5
7.4
0.3
2.7
3.0
0.5
Ca (cmol/kg)
1.4
6.5
0.7
1.6
4.3
0.9
2.0
2.9
1.0
Mg (cmol/kg)
5.8
1.6
0.6
8.9
1.2
1.0
9.8
1.3
1.2
CEC (cmol/kg)
11.7
10.0
2.3
14.8
7.2
3.0
16.1
5.0
3.2
SAND (%)
86
78
94
82
76
86
72
74
80
SILT (%)
5
14
2
7
14
10
5
12
8
CLAY (%)
9
8
4
11
10
4
23
14
12
Textural class
Loamy sand
Sandy loam
Sand
loamy sand
Sandy loam
Sand
Sandy Clay loam
Sandy loam
Loamy sand
pH
8.37
6.19
8.32
9.35
9.81
8.20
EC (dS/m)
3.18
2.82
4.81
0.91
0.85
2.97
O.C (%)
47.88
90.97
26.45
2.59
3.78
24.38
N (%)
0.67
0.60
0.81
1.61
1.19
1.47
P (mg/kg)
12971
12466
23995
6570
4885
4965
K (mg/kg)
12099
11729
797
1026
1099
779
Ca (mg/kg)
98.31
133.84
221.08
68.97
102.69
50.28
Mg(mg/kg)
92.5
54.8
59.4
101.7
66.6
111.8
Control
F1
-
-
-
-
Cattle manure (50g/hill) + Poultry manure (50g/hill)
F2
51
40
51
Cattle manure (100g/hill)
F3
30
27
36
NPK 80:60:60
F4
80
80
80
NPK (3g/hill)
F5
20
20
20
NPK (3g/hill) + Cattle (100g/hill)
F6
35
33
38
Poultry (100g/hill)
F7
72
53
65
Poultry (100g/hill) + NPK (3g/hill)
F8
92
73
85
Poultry (150g/hill)
F9
107
79
98
Poultry (50g/hill)
F10
36
26
33
Jan
11.9
16.7
13.2
28.0
33.7
28.6
0
3
0
Feb
17.6
16.6
19.4
35.2
30.6
36.6
0
0
0
Mar
21.5
19.7
21.3
36.3
36.7
39.6
0
0
1
Apr
26.0
25.7
25.5
41.9
38.3
41.3
0
16
0
May
25.7
25.9
25.0
38.6
37.7
37.9
62
45
40
Jun
23.2
23.7
23.7
33.9
33.3
35.1
177
142
99
Jul
22.7
22.5
22.1
31.8
31.1
31.7
78
131
42
Aug
21.8
22.2
21.5
30.8
30.4
30.6
238
181
320
Sep
22.1
22.4
22.1
32.8
32.2
32.5
87
107
182
Oct
21.1
19.2
21.9
36.4
34.1
35.4
7
7
2
Nov
18.5
15.1
16.2
35.8
32.7
34.5
0
0
0
Dec
16.1
15.5
14.1
31.8
29.5
30.2
0
0
0
Total rainfall
Number of rainy days (NRD)
Jan
12.7
15.2
13.2
28.9
33.2
26.2
0
0
0
Feb
15.0
16.4
17.5
33.3
36.0
35.6
0
0
0
Mar
24.0
22.8
18.9
39.4
40.1
39.3
0
0
1
Apr
25.6
26.2
24.9
41.8
41.1
40.8
0
10
0
May
26.1
25.9
25.9
39.1
38.0
37.6
71
39
29
Jun
23.5
23.7
24.4
34.1
34.3
35.8
256
317
65
Jul
23.0
22.4
22.5
32.5
31.8
31.8
127
153
112
Aug
22.0
22.4
22.1
32.5
31.4
30.9
201
228
329
Sep
22.2
22.7
22.5
34.0
33.5
33.1
106
137
72
Oct
19.1
19.5
20.9
37.0
35.4
36.4
0
5
8
Nov
15.1
15.5
14.5
35.6
30.4
35.7
0
0
0
Dec
11.7
17.3
12.7
30.8
29.8
30.0
0
0
0
Total rainfall
Number of rainy days (NRD)
Treatments / Site
BUK
Minjibir
1000-Seed Weight (g)
Grain Yield (kgha-1)
Stalk Yield (kgha-1)
1000-Seed Weight (g)
Grain Yield (kgha-1)
Stalk Yield (kgha-1)
2016
30.0
1577
8332
30.3
1391
9586
2017
31.3
2205
8709
28.5
1504
10120
2018
27. 9
1669
9437
29.3
1636
8420
P of F
0.002
<.001
0.328
0.056
0.122
0.087
LSD
1.35
116
1672
1.44
243
1547
F1
28.8
1209
6275
29.1
969
6060
F2
30.1
2023
10032
28.8
1413
8492
F3
29.8
1660
8703
28.5
1119
7438
F4
30.0
1732
8724
30.2
1574
11180
F5
29.3
1860
8511
29.3
1747
10836
F6
29.6
2090
9008
30.1
1661
9956
F7
30.4
1900
9527
29.7
1456
9359
F8
29.9
2243
10239
28.7
2250
11688
F9
29.1
2010
9263
29.7
1606
10345
F10
29.9
1445
7978
29.5
1307
8398
P of F
0.74
<.001
<.001
0.76
<.001
<.001
LSD
1.71
240
1624
2.02
197
894
CSR-01
30.4
1118
9970
29.7
1064
8304
Improved Deko
28.6
2548
8219
26.9
2096
11965
Kaura
30.4
1786
8289
31.5
1371
7857
P of F
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
LSD
0.74
111
632
1.15
92
312
Mean
29.7
1817
8826
29.4
1510
9375
CV
9.7
16
28
15.3
24
13
Y x F
ns
ns
ns
***
Y x V
***
***
***
***
***
***
F x V
ns
ns
ns
ns
***
***
Y x F x V
ns
ns
ns
ns
***
***
F1
784
1254
649
3386
10637
2560
F2
937
1990
591
4025
16085
3474
F3
911
1776
575
3658
13496
2707
F4
1225
2666
784
9024
23308
6144
F5
1201
2929
721
10807
22744
4857
F6
1461
1992
951
9291
14918
6318
F7
1244
2265
623
6421
15290
5457
F8
1347
3648
782
7185
24276
7306
F9
1340
1984
600
7351
18034
5875
F10
1117
2481
901
4513
15360
3073
Mean
1198
2415
725
6566
17415
4777
F1
628
1332
995
7023
7527
7943
F2
907
1896
1581
10086
10686
9803
F3
1077
1513
1091
10510
7997
8910
F4
961
1562
1637
10286
9286
13303
F5
1174
2138
1310
10953
9340
10090
F6
1425
2022
1865
9506
8870
10666
F7
1201
1902
1100
10670
9163
11000
F8
1952
2950
2302
12203
11710
12510
F9
1177
2610
1587
13033
10426
11286
F10
960
1246
1297
9076
8530
11200
Mean
1204
1982
1530
10335
9354
10671
F1
693
1195
1195
5067
5967
4433
F2
867
2042
1904
7067
8233
6967
F3
577
1343
1205
6167
7033
6467
F4
945
2327
2057
9300
10100
9866
F5
860
2669
2438
9100
10000
9633
F6
1025
2333
1875
9833
11000
9200
F7
757
2060
1955
7600
9866
8766
F8
1437
2875
3238
9300
10733
9966
F9
944
2087
2125
8433
9966
8700
F10
778
1783
1203
8233
8367
7233
F7, F9 -10 Vs F1
Poultry Manure versus Control
1911
<.001
1593
<.001
vs
vs
1208
958
F7, F9 -10 Vs F2
Poultry Manure versus Poultry Manure + Cattle Manure
1911
0.737
1593
0.327
vs
vs
2042
1480
F7, F9 -10 Vs F3
Poultry Manure versus Cattle Manure
1911
0.567
1593
0.027
vs
vs
1732
1337
F7, F9 -10 Vs F4
Poultry Manure versus NPK 80:60:60
1911
0.215
1593
0.782
vs
vs
1829
1625
F7, F9 -10 Vs F5
Poultry Manure versus NPK Micro-dose
1911
0.213
1593
0.067
vs
vs
1960
1806
F7, F9 -10 Vs F6
Poultry Manure versus Cattle Manure + NPK Micro-dose
1911
0.366
1593
0.367
vs
vs
2091
1698
F7, F9 -10 Vs F8
Poultry Manure versus Poultry Manure + NPK Micro-dose
1911
0.007
1593
<.001
vs
vs
2302
2398
F1
5.2
4.0
F2
18.0
5.4
14.1
3.5
F3
16.8
4.4
14
3.1
F4
8.7
4.9
9.4
3.9
F5
37.6
5.2
40
4.3
F6
17.5
5.6
18.3
4
F7
12.7
5.2
11.5
3.7
F8
13.7
19.6
F9
7.8
5.3
8.3
4.2
F10
16.7
4.5
19.2
3.4
LSD
4.6
0.6
1.1
0.4
CSR-01
9.8
3
12.5
2.5
Improved Deko
22.7
7.7
26.1
5.8
Kaura
17.3
4.8
12.8
3.6
LSD
2.64
0.3
0.6
0.188
Mean
16.6
5.2
17.2
4
CV
14.7
21.4
13
18.6
F x V
***
***
***
***
Naira ha-1
Naira ha-1
F1
85,064
242,348
157,284
2.85
80,765
211,760
130,995
2.62
F2
178,435
398,626
220,191
2.23
168,426
309,018
140,592
1.83
F3
138,412
338,659
200,247
2.44
134,380
275,613
141,233
2.05
F4
145,339
349,945
204,606
2.41
141,122
375,833
234,711
2.68
F5
111,275
358,163
246,888
3.21
108,168
384,690
276,522
3.58
F6
158,151
380,146
221,995
2.4
155,310
360,166
204,856
2.32
F7
215,166
381,782
166,616
1.77
199,628
335,708
136,080
1.68
F8
238,252
425,129
186,877
1.78
224,526
460,267
235,741
2.05
F9
275,031
379,810
104,779
1.38
255,358
370,144
114,786
1.45
F10
153,047
325,774
172,727
2.12
145,112
307,002
161,890
2.12
CSR-01
169,817
324,635
154,818
2.06
161,280
276,200
114,920
1.82
Improved Deko
411,395
241,578
2.59
441,567
280,287
2.95
Kaura
338,085
168,268
2.12
299,293
138,013
1.95
Conclusion
Current research shows that fertilization can directly affect fertility pollination and the number of seeds per panicle rather than the weight of individual seeds, but it has a very significant impact on grain yields. However, there are significant differences in seed weight between different sorghum varieties. Weather, especially rainfall distribution, affects grain and Stalk yields. The sorghum variety (improved Deko syn: SAMSORG 45) is more suitable for the Sudan savanna region of Nigeria and is worthy of promotion. The improved Deko resulted in average grain yields 56% and 49% higher than CSR 01 and local Kaura in BUK and Minjibir, respectively. Tests have shown that applying a small amount of organic and inorganic fertilizers can significantly increase sorghum grain and stalk yields compared with blanket-type recommended inorganic fertilizers. For example, 100 g of poultry manure plus 3 g of NPK per hill increased yields by 7-86% in BUK and 29-132% in Minjibir compared to other fertilization strategies and no fertilization. Likewise, poultry manure has a higher nutrient content than cow manure, resulting in higher grain and stalk yields per unit of manure. NUE is driven by changes in N remobilization and utilization, and it increases with a decrease in the quantity of N applied, which has a positive impact on soil water availability. Excessive rainfall increases nitrogen losses through leaching and favors soil conditions associated with denitrification activities and processes. Applying 20 kgNha-1, i.e. 3 g NPK per hill instead of 95 kgNha-1, i.e. 150 g poultry manure, indicated NUE of 37.6 and 7.8 kg grain kgN-1 at BUK, and 40 and 8.3 kg grain kgN-1 at Minjibir, respectively. The WUE of the improved Deko was 7.66 kg and 5.83 kg of grain mm-1, while the CSR 01 had the lowest WUE values of 3.02 kg and 2.5 kg of grain mm-1 at BUK and Minjibir,. Application of NPK at 3 g per hill recorded higher benefit-cost ratios of 3.21 and 3.58 benefitted per naira invested and better profit gains of N 246,888 and N 276,522 ha-1 for BUK and Minjibir, respectively. In organic farming without the use of inorganic fertilizers, higher grain and Stalk yields can be obtained by applying 150 grams of poultry manure per hill and deserve further consideration as a preferred application. Under integrated farming systems, where farmers produce organic fertilizer on-site, 100 grams of poultry manure plus 3 grams of NPK per hill is applied, resulting in high sorghum grain yield and good benefits. Improved Deko is found to be the variety with the best grain yield, NUE, WUE, total revenue generation, total profit gain, benefit-cost ratio, and the least crop moisture loss through crop evapotranspiration, therefore considered the best sorghum variety to be produced in the experimental locations. Further analysis and modeling of nutrient cycling and organic farming, especially poultry production and the use of poultry manure to grow sorghum is recommended.