The research was conducted the 2017/18 and 2018/19 in four locations under irrigation system. Three studies were conducted in northern region of Sudan. One study was conducted at Shendi Research Station Farm (latitude 16^° 41^' - 16^° 45^' N, longitude 33^° 25^' -33^° 29^'E) in the River Nile State. The second was conducted at Hudeiba Research Station Farm (latitude 17° 33' -17° 37'N, longitude 33^° 56^' - 33^° 59^'E) with an average annual rainfall of 74 mm/ann., while the third study was carried out at Merowe locality, in Research Station Farm, (Latitude: 18^° 27^' - 18^° 31^' N, Longitude: 31° 49' -31° 53' E, Elevation of 258 meters above the sea level). The three Research Station Farms are located in a desert climatic zone, which is characterized by dry and hot climate. In this region, during the winter, temperatures are warm at the day and cool at night, where the temperature can reach to 0°C. The rest of the year, from May to September is very hot, and the temperature could reach to 40 °C, and sometimes could reach up to 50/52°C. Moreover, the wind can raise sandstorms at any time of the year (Sudan Metrology 2022)1612. The soil in this region is mostly sand, which is poor due to low nutrient elements and organic matter. except the soil along the river Nile which is mostly loamy clay. The fourth study location was Wad Medani, Gezira State, Gezira Research Station Farm (GRSF) which is located in the central clay plain of Sudan at latitude of 14° 24' N, 14° 36' N, longitude of 33^° 29^' - 33^° 35^' E and elevation of 407 meters above the sea level. Where the soil is heavy cracking clay, alkaline (clay 58%, pH 8.3, organic matter 0.02, nitrogen 0.25, phosphorus 0.06 and potash 3.0%). However, the four locations represent different agro-ecological regions for growing chickpea in Sudan.

Three chickpea genotypes were obtained from the advanced materials of the national chickpea breeding program in the Agricultural Research Corporation (ARC)-Sudan. Moreover, two released chickpea cultivars (Shiekh Mohamed and Burgeig) were used in this study as checks (Table 1).

Across all growing seasons and locations, the land was well prepared using disc plowing, disc- harrowing, leveling and ridging. The experiments were arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replicates in all locations. Each genotype was planted in a separate plot composed of five ridges; each of 5 m in length, with plant-to-plant and row-to-row distance of 10 and 60 cm, respectively. Sowing was done in the second week of November during the two winter seasons. Frequent irrigation was carried out at 14-16 days intervals to avoid water stress. The experimental plots were treated with a starter dose of nitrogen in the form of urea at the rate of 43kg N/ha before the fourth irrigation. Two hand weeding was done. Seed yield was assessed from a net area of 8.28 m2(3 rows x 4.6 m length x 0.6 m).

During the two seasons, data pertaining the Days to 50% flowering (were registered as days from sowing to the date of flowering, when about 50% of the plants bear at least one flower). Hundred-seed weight (g.) (calculated by 100 seed samples which were randomly selected from each plot], seeds weight (seed weighed using a sensitive balance. The latter parameter was recorded after harvesting, threshing and winnowing (in g or kg)). The seed yield (was weighed using electronic balance on net plot basis and later converted into t/ha.for each genotype).

The five chickpea genotypes were screened for resistance to Fusarium wilt disease in an infested plot at Gezira Research Station Farm during the winter season of 2018/2019, the evaluated for Fusarium wilt disease was done at three stages during the crop cycle (seedling, flowering and pod setting stages). Where disease incidence (%)=(number of wilted plants/ total number of plants) x 100 was determined, and the level of resistance and susceptibility of each tested genotype was determined by using rating scale, with some modifications, where R = 0-20% wilted plants, MR = 21-40% wilted plant, S=41-80% wilted plants and HS = ≥ 80% wilted plants. Furthermore, the wilted plants were checked for vascular discoloration symptoms and re-isolation to confirm the disease was Fusarium wilt caused by fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Ciceris1,6,17

The collected data were statistically analyzed using the GenStat 12^th edition18. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for measuring all the studied characters was carried out according to the procedure described by 19.

To determine the performance, stability and genotypic superiority across environments or at specific environment, additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was used 20 AMMI stability value (ASV) was calculated for each genotype according to the relative contribution of IPCA1 and IPCA2 to the interaction sum square (SS) following the method proposed by 21. According to ASV, a genotype with lower ASV score is regarded as more stable. To combine both mean seed yield and stability index in a single criterion, the genotype selection index (GSI) was calculated for each genotype based on the rank of mean seed yield of genotypes across environments and rank of AMMI stability value as proposed by. Similar to ASV, genotype with lower GSI value is regarded as more adapted. Also the GGE biplot model 19 was followed to test the seed yield stability performance for the three tested chickpea genotypes plus the two checks22.

The results of data analysis for yield and yield related traits in different locations are presented in the Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8, Table 9 and Table 10 and figure 1 and figure 2.

Considering Table 2, presents the analysis of mean seed yield of the genotypes across the eight environments showing significant effects of genotype, location, year and their interactions on seed yield. The highly significant differences among the tested genotypes indicated that those genotypes which have phenotypic variation and genetic diversity showed effectiveness of selection for the development of new genetic cultivars possessing improved traits. For the average seed yield across the eight environments, the genotype FLIP 08-59 C showed the highest average seed yield and out-yielded the checks, Shiekh Mohamed and Burgeig genotypes in the 6^th- and 5^th- environments, respectively. More-specifically, it out-yielded the check Shiekh Mohamed, in six environments by an average of 20.4% and the second check Burgeig in five environments by an average of 17.4%.

Average seed yield of the five chickpea genotypes across the eight environments varied from 1.45 to/ 1.88 ton/ha. This indicates the wide variability for yield potential among the chickpea genotypes. The three locations, Merowe, Gezira and Shendi, gave the highest seed yield of 2.62, 1.96 and 1.16 ton/ha, respectively. On the other hand, the Hudeiba site recorded the lowest seed yield (0.84 ton/ha). Across all sites, the highest mean seed yield was recorded by the genotype FLIP 08-59,C (1.88 ton/ha) followed by the check Shiekh Mohamed (1.70 ton/ha).

The genotype FLIP 08-59 C produced the higher seed yield compared to the check Burgeig at Medani and Hudeiba sites. The same genotype gave significantly higher seed yield than the check Shiekh Mohamed at Shendi site. At Merowe site, the genotype FLIP 08 -59 C produced a comparable seed yield to the check Burgeig.

At Gezira site, the genotype FLIP 08-59 C produced the highest seed yield and exceeded the two checks, Burgeig and Shiekh Mohamed by 21.1% and 15.8%, respectively. Whereas at Shendi site, the genotype FLIP 08-59 C recorded the highest yield and out-yielded the two checks, Shiekh Mohamed and Burgeig by 35.9% and 11.1%, respectively. At Hudeiba site, also the genotype FLIP 08-59 produced the higher seed yield and exceeded the two checks Burgeig and Shiekh Mohamed by 18.0% and 6.6%, respectively.

The genotype FLIP 09-182 C at Gezira site gave better seed yield and out – yield the two checks Shiekh Mohamed and Burgeig by 8.6% and 14.3%, respectively.

The above Table 3 reflects the combined analysis of variance showing high significant differences (P ≤ 0.001) among the years, location, genotypes, genotype x yea, genotype x location, and genotype x year x location interaction for all studied characters including seed yield Table 4, presents the mean days to 50% flowering of genotypes across eight environments displaying the effect of location and interaction between the genotypes. Year and location were found to be highly significant.

However, across all sites, there were highly significant differences among genotypes in days to 50% flowering with over all mean of days to 50% flowering, ranging between 39 and 48 days in season 2017/18, whereas ranging between 48 and 42 days in 2018/19. The genotype FLIP 08-59 C was the earliest to reach 50% flowering but with non-significant differences as compared to the two checks. Table 5, shows the mean 100-seed weight (g) of genotypes across the eight environments Over all sites, there were highly significant differences among genotypes in 100–seed weight (P ≤ 0.001). The overall mean of 100-seed weight (g) ranged between 19 and 31g. in season 2017/18, whereas, in season 2018/19 the genotype FLIP 09-182 C recorded the heaviest 100-seeds weight (34 g), while the check Burgeig produced the lowest value of 22 g.

Regarding the evaluation of Fusarium wilt disease (Fusarium oxysporumf.sp.ciceris), the results summarized in Table 6 presenting the five chickpea genotypes under disease conditions at Gezira Research Station Farm during the winter of 2018/2019 showed varied resistance to Fusarium wilt at seedling stage and the percent of the infection ranged between 17.2 to 26.5% which is ranked under the resistance level (Resistance to Moderately resistance) of the used scale for the disease. The highest disease incidence was recorded by variety Burgeig (26.5%) followed by genotype FLIP 09-187 C (25.4%) and variety Shiekh Mohamed (23.0%). The lowest disease incidence (17.2%) was scored by the genotype FLIP 08–59 C.

The study showed significant differences among the genotypes on fusarium wilt incidence at flowering and podding stages which ranged from 11.3 to 22.2% and 24.4to 39.8%, From the above results, the genotype FLIP 08–59 C was found to the most resistant to Fusarium wilt disease among all the tested genotypes.

Regarding the Yield Stability, analysis of variance the study showed high significant differences among the tested genotypes (G) for seed yield, environments (E) and their interactions (GEI) Table 7.

The highly significant differences observed among environments indicated that these genotypes were evaluated under diverse seasons and locations. The mean square of G x E interaction also showed high significant differences for most of the traits indicating the effect of the environment and genotype interaction. The mean square of G x E (linear) interaction was not significant.

Stability models were followed to carry out the seed yield stability performance for the three tested chickpea genotypes against the two checks. These were the Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative I nteraction GGE biplot model 23 and (AMMI) model 24.

Table 8, reflects the Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of AMMI showing the chickpea seed yield was high significantly (P ≤ 0.001) affected by environment (E), genotype (G) and their interaction (GEI). Over all sites, the effect of the environment was significantly, and it was about 90.2% of the total sum of the square, indicating that the environments were diverse. On the other hand, the genotypic effect was explained by significant, but small portion of 3.6% and the (G x E) by (6.3%). The large environmental contribution effect indicated that the maximum variation for the genotypes performance was due to the environmental differences. The significance of the interaction component was 6.3% of the total sum of the square, indicating that the best genotype in one environment is not necessarily the best in another. Therefore, when recommending promising genotypes to an environment we need to take into consider their adaptability and stability.

For the GGE biplot analysis, the GGE refers to the genotype main effect (G) and the genotype x environment interaction (GE) which are the most important sources of variation for a genotype evaluation in multi environmental trials 25. The presence of genotype x environment interaction (GEI) was clearly demonstrated by the AMMI model. When the interaction was partitioned among the first interactions principal component axis (IPCA), they were found to be significant in the assessment. The first principal component (IPCA1) accounted for (58.8%) of the variation caused by interaction, and the second principal component (IPCA2) accounted for (33.2%) of this variation. These are in agreement with the finding of one of the researchers 26. who recommended that the most accurate model for AMMI can be predicted using the first principal components (IPCAs).

Table 9 shows the estimates of stability parameters for yield (t/ha) of five chickpea genotypes in eight environments. AMMI stability values (ASV) revealed variations in yield stability among the 5 chickpea genotypes. This result agrees with the results obtained by one of the studies 27. However stability of a variety is defined as one with ASV value close to zero. Consequently, the G1 (FLIP 08-59C) with ASV value of 0.58 is the most stable after the G4 (Shiekh Mohamed) with ASV value of 0.29. While other genotypes, FLIP 09-182 C, FLIP 09-187 C and check Burgeig are the least stable.

Genotype Selection Index (GSI) measure is essential for quantifying and ranking genotypes according to their yield stability. The one with high seed yield and least (GSI) is considered as the most stable 28. Based on the GSI, the most desirable genotypes for selection of both stability and high seed yielding were the genotypes G4 (Shiekh Mohamed), G1 (FLIP 08-59C) and G2 (FLIP 09-182 C), respectively.

For GGE biplot analysis model, the GGE analysis showed 58.81% and 33.16 % of total variation in the data matrix of GGE respectively, and thus they are accounted for 91.97 % of GGE together (Figure 1).

According to GGE analysis, the genotypes with PC1 scores is close to zero expressed general adaptation, whereas the larger scores are for more specific adaptation to particular environments ²⁹. Figure 1and Figure 2 showed AMMI and GGE biplots of seed yield of 5 chickpea genotypes across eight environments. The G1 (FLIP 08-59C) was the most stable and best genotypes across the different environments in Sudan.