Abstract
Sugar beet is one of the sugar crops which widely grown in different regions of the world due to its advantages over Sugarcane. Several studies were conducted in Sudan to assess its adaptation and economic value. However, the aim of this experiment was to study the effect of application of compost and different levels of phosphorus fertilizer and their combination on Sugar beet (
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2021
A. Marajan Wael., et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Sugar beet ( Despite the importance of sugar beet as an industrial cash crop, its productivity remains low because many farmers luck the technical knowhow of its production; and therefore, it became necessary to pay great attention to this point and look for naturally safe stimulating growth substances which can markedly influence plant growth and yield parameters Studies showed that compost contains important elements such as nitrogen 0.3% – 1.5% (3g to 15g per kg of compost), phosphorus 0.1% – 1.0% (1g to 10g per kg of compost); and potassium 0.3% – 1.0% (3g to 10g per kg of compost) It is very important to understand the problem of phosphorus in agriculture, particularly its various forms in the soils, transformation, mobilization, and the conditions for the most effective use of phosphorus 10, 11 There are a lot of information on the various forms of various phosphates and their quantitative content in different soils. The accumulation of mobile phosphates and phosphates of loose-bound and the different-base fractions in the soil are the basis for increasing sugar beet yields. The actual concentration of soluble phosphorous in most soils is relatively low—on the order of 1μM—because of several factors, among these the propensity of phosphorous to form insoluble complexes In plants, phosphorous is found largely as phosphate esters-including the sugar-phosphates, which play such an important role in photosynthesis, intermediary metabolism and energy metabolism of cells It worth mentioning that most of the studies on sugar beet crops concentrated on how to increase the root and sugar productivity. Therefore, many researchers have studied the effects of different fertilization levels and/or different growth regulators. This experiment aimed to study the response of sugar beet growth parameters, yield and yield components to the application of compost and phosphorus fertilizes under saline soil conditions.
Materials And Methods
The experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2016-2017 in the demonstration farm of the College of Agriculture, University of Bahri, Khartoum North, Alkadaro, Sudan (Latitudes 150.44ʹ-150.45ʹ N, Longitudes 320 35ʹ 320 39ʹ E. and Altitudes 398m above the sea level). The area is located in semi-arid zone, characterized by long period of dry season, hot climate in summer with mean daily maximum temperature between 30 -45°C, and cool in winter, with temperature between 25-10oC. Usually it rains in summer and the annual average rainfall ranges between 0 -100mm, and the relative humidity between16% - 50%. The soil is moderate to strong alkaline, with pH 7.5-8; EC 1.1-8.3 dSm-1 17. This study adopted the Randomized Complete Block (RCBD) experimental design with three replications and six treatments; compost 5t/ha, phosphorus 88Kg P2O5/ha, phosphorus 176 Kg P2O5/ha, compost 5t/ha + phosphorus 88Kg P2O5/ha, compost 5t/ha + phosphorus 176Kg P2O5/ha and control which referred to (O, P1, P2, P1O, P2O and C) respectively. Soil was prepared by disk plough, harrowed, leveled, and ridged. Plot size was 5x4 m; spacing between ridges was 70 cm and 15 cm between plants. Seeds were manually planted on 13/12/2016 by placing two seeds /hole and thinned to one plant/hole. Frequent irrigation was carried out every 7-10 days. Harvesting was done on 7/5/2017. Data were collected by taking three plants at random from the two outer rows of each plot after 7, 10, 13, and 16 weeks after sowing (WAS). The following parameters were studied, the Leaves number, Leaf dry weight (g), Leaf Area Index, Root diameter (cm), Root fresh weight (g), Yield and yield components. The data were analyzed, using Statistic 8 software Program.
Results
Results in WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5% level according to (LSD). The results of data analysis WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5% level according to (LSD). Leaves dry weight (LDW) (g) of sugar beet; 16 DAS was significantly affected by the different treatments of compost, phosphorus and their combinations WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5% level according to (LSD). Data analysis in WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5% level according to (LSD). Results in WAS: Weeks after sowing. Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5% level according to (LSD). Considering the Means followed by the same latter(s) within a column are not significantly different at the 5% level according to (LSD).
Time Treatment.
7WAS
10 WAS
13 WAS
16 WAS
Control
8.22 bc
17.89 ab
25.67 ab
31.89 bc
O
9.33 ab
20.22 a
26.89 a
34.89 ab
P1
7.67 c
16.55 b
22.67 b
27.89 d
P2
8.33 bc
21.00 a
25.45 ab
28.89 cd
P1 + O
9.89 a
19.67 ab
26.00 ab
33.89 ab
P2 + O
9.56 ab
20.31 a
24.78 ab
36.33 a
SE+
0.673
1.563
1.583
1.514
C.V
9.33
9.93
7.68
5.74
Time Treatment
7WAS
10 WAS
13 WAS
16 WAS
Control
0.71 c
2.60 ab
2.45 b
09.60 bc
O
1.03 ab
3.23 ab
5.38 a
10.45 ab
P1
0.71 c
2.10 b
4.10 ab
08.43 c
P2
0.69 c
3.36 a
5.05 a
09.01 bc
P1 + O
0.78 bc
3.52 a
5.89 a
10.73 ab
P2 + O
1.13 a
2.63 ab
4.86 a
11.53 a
SE+
0.129
0.509
0.918
0.834
C.V
18.77
21.46
24.33
10.27
TimeTreatment.
7WAS
10 WAS
13 WAS
16 WAS
Control
7.27 c
23.32 c
32.61 cd
42.70 d
O
7.90 bc
28.79 a
35.22 c
44.94 c
P1
7.21 c
27.08 b
32.01 d
44.68 cd
P2
8.02 abc
25.98 bc
34.56 cd
46.18 c
P1 + O
9.05 a
35.63 a
46.30 a
56.12 a
P2 + O
8.54 ab
34.40 a
41.15 b
52.63 b
SE+
0.510
1.362
1.283
0.969
C.V
7.82
5.71
4.25
2.48
TimeTreatment
7WAS
10 WAS
13 WAS
16 WAS
Control
21.41 c
37.04 b
55.37 d
82.47 c
O
28.10 a
58.15 a
84.53 a
107.90 a
P1
23.24 bc
35.98 b
59.77 cd
86.37 c
P2
23.27 bc
39.61 b
61.68 c
96.24 b
P1 + O
26.74 ab
55.44 a
68.16 b
106.45 a
P2 + O
28.14 a
55.64 a
67.89 b
99.33 b
SE+
1.605
2.074
2.404
3.025
C.V
7.82
5.41
4.45
3.84
TimeTreatment.
7WAS
10 WAS
13 WAS
16 WAS
Control
34.777b
153.77c
429.20ab
569.01c
O
45.600a
206.87b
457.63a
777.33ab
P1
37.167b
125.33d
345.11c
688.12bc
P2
34.537b
147.01cd
380.58bc
666.27bc
P1 + O
45.303a
258.99a
452.16a
934.25a
P2 + O
45.320a
258.56a
466.74a
705.69bc
SE+
1.6088
11.125
25.778
76.952
C.V
4.87
7.11
7.48
13.03
Time Treatment.
pol%
Brix %
Root Yield t/ha
White Sugar t/ha
Control
14.36a
16.63a
41.94b
6.02b
O
15.41a
19.10a
43.71b
6.58ab
P1
14.23a
17.18a
44.28b
6.35ab
P2
15.79a
20.13a
40.00b
6.32ab
P1 + O
15.97a
18.97a
53.83a
8.68a
P2 + O
14.21a
17.38a
44.28b
6.36ab
SE+
1.641
1.922
4.124
1.120
C.V
13.40
12.91
11.31
20.41
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that application of compost had enhanced the mineral nutrition and fertility of soil by slow releasing of nutrients during the growing season. The combination of compost and phosphorus raised the content of nitrogen and soluble phosphate in the soil which led to an increase of vegetative growth and assimilate production. The application of compost and phosphorus combinations had positive effects on vegetative growth, yield and yield components of sugar beet than single application. It is recommended that this study to be replicated in Alkadaro and other locations under different climatic conditions and soils.