Abstract
In regions where irrigation water supplies are limited, drainage or water with salinity can be used to supplement them. Field experiments were carried out during the quinoa growing season of 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 at North Sinai in order to evaluate six quinoa genotypes (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under saline irrigation (5400 ppm) on growth, yield, its component, seeds chemical composition under field conditions. For plot 50% heading and maturity, the most earliness averages were 47.25 and 92.50 day, respectively for genotype Q-Q37-1, while the least earliness averages were 55.75 and 96.25 for genotypes KVLSRA 2 and KVLSRA 1, respectively. The highest averages was recorded for number of panicles/plant, plant fresh weight, plant yield weight, harvest index, 1000 seeds weight index and yield / fed-1 (ton) were 12.27, 82.32 gm, 17.83 gm, 28.89 %, 2.97 gm and 1.84 ton fed-1 ) for genotypes Q-Q37-1, Q-Q37-1, Q-Q37-1, Q-Q37-1, Q52 and Q-Q37-1, respectively. While, the lowest values were recorded for genotypes KVLSRA1, KVLSRA1, KVLSRA1, Regeolona, KVLSRA1 and KVLSRA1 with averages 8.72, 23.73gm, 5.52 gm, 22.76 %, 2.43 gm and 1.23 ton fed-1, respectively. For protein and carbohydrates total content, values ranged from 14.75 to 10.59 and from 58.13 to 54.64 % for genotypes Q52 and Regeolona, respectively. While in moisture content, values ranged from 11.66 to 10.83 for genotypes KVLSR1 and Q-Q37-1 , respectively. Also, fats content ranged from 10.44 to 7.14 % for genotypes Q52 and Regeolona, respectively. While values of saponin ranged from 0.56 to 0.37% for genotypes KVLSR1 and Regeolona, respectively.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2019
A. Mohamed Moatz, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Salinity is considered as main major problem in agriculture, particularly because saline soils are found primarily in arid regions where draught, extreme temperatures, and nutrient deficiency go hand in hand, and where scarce precipitation and high evaporation hinder a leaching out of the salts that accumulate in the upper soil layers. It is estimated that between 340 and as much as 950 billion squares kilometers, equivalent to about 20% of the arid and semiarid soils of the world, or 6% of the world land area, are saline. There is an increase in salinization due to irrigation, which is estimated to affect 50% of irrigated land Quinoa ( Quinoa derived from the Spanish spelling of the Quechua name kinwa or occasionally "Qin-wah", a species of goosefoot ( The panicles arise either from the top of the plant or from axils on the stem. The panicles have a central axis from which a secondary axis emerges either with flowers (amaranthiform), or bearing a tertiary axis carrying the flowers (glomeruliform). The green, hypogenous flowers have a simple perianth and are generally bisexual and self-fertilizing. The seeds are achenes about 2-3 mm in diameter and are found in a large array of pigments. From white to red, purple, and black, which are probably associated with “eco-type” and vary from region to region. Quinoa originated in the Andean region of Ecuador, Bolivia, Colombia and Peru, where it was successfully domesticated 3,000 to 4,000 years ago for human consumption, though archeological evidence shows a non-domesticated association with pastoral herding some 5,200 to 7,000 years ago. Quinoa seeds are utilized to make flour for biscuits and cakes, added directly into soups, eaten as breakfast- type cereal, the fresh leaves and tender shoots of the plant are eaten raw in salads, or cooked and eaten as a vegetable. The young sprouts can also be added to salads or eaten plain It is seen to be as an alternative to cereals in human diet and animal feeds, cultivation and processing are thus necessary to exploit the potential of this crop on a wider geographic basis than hitherto Also, It has been selected by FAO as one of the crops destined to offer food security in this century. The genetic variability of quinoas huge, with cultivars being adapted to growth from sea level to 4000 masl, from 40 degrees S to 2 degrees N, and from cold, highland climates to tropical conditions. It was described as a likely candidate crop for NASA's Controlled Ecological Life port System In Europe, quinoa was suggested to be as a break crop between cereal crops and after potato crops. When grown in areas to which it is best adapted, it should be able to compete with cereals in both human diets and animal rations It was suggested to be an important new crop for Pakistan agriculture, providing highly nutritive and versatile food products for the population and a new raw material for the industry. In particular, it could be cultivated in many of the marginal environments afflicted by drought or salinity stress, which currently suffer from very low productivity Environmental extreme conditions of Southern America , Pakistan and Egypt deserts tend to participate similar features (both of them face draught and salinity problems side by side) , so that, quinoa could be suggested as an attractive alternative crop for the arid and semiarid regions, where water deficiency and salinity have been recognized as major agricultural problems
Materials And Methods
This study was carried out at the experimental farm of Environmental Agricultural Sciences Faculty, El- Arish, North Sinai, during 2015/2016 and 2016 /2017 seasons. The name and origin of the studied quinoa un branched- genotypes (Chenopodium quinoa W.) are shown in Two seasons field experiments were carried out at Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Farm, during two seasons (2015/16 and 2016/17), to evaluate plant growth, yield, yield components and chemical composition of six quinoa genotypes. The meteorological data of average temperature, relative humidity and rainfall during seasons are shown in Source: Central laboratory for agricultural climate, Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt
No.
Name/ Cross
Origin
1
KVLSRA 1
Denmark
2
KVLSRA 2
Denmark
3
KVLSRA 3
Denmark
4
Q-52
Chile
5
Q-Q 37
Chile
6
REGEOLONA
Chile
Month
2015/2016 season
2016/2017 season
Max. Temp. (C°)
Min. Temp. (C°)
Humidity (%)
Max. Temp. (C°)
Min. Tempe. (C°)
Humidity (%)
October
30.3
20.0
77.9
30.3
16.9
68.2
November
26.6
14.7
76.7
26.7
13.2
58.2
December
21.1
8.2
78.1
20.9
9.0
56.8
January
18.6
7.1
78.8
18.8
5.8
62.9
February
22.6
8.8
81.4
18.68
6.50
73.14
March
24.4
11.3
73.6
23.2
9.5
67.0
April
28.7
13.7
69.3
25.5
12.1
63.1
May
30.4
16.4
59.3
29.5
15.5
61.6
Soil depth cm
Organic matter (%)
PH.
Particle size distribution %
Irrigation water
Sand
Silt
Clay
PH
EC
ppm
0-15
2.70
9.1
83.00
12
5
7.5
7.1
5400
15-30
2.90
9.3
83.00
12
5
Results
Data in Concerning to season 2015/16 the data in Data in Data in
Genotypes
Plot 50% heading (days)
Plot 50% maturity (days)
2015/16
2016/17
2015/16
2016/17
KVLSRA 1
55.80 ±2.17b
45.66 ±2.60d
96.25±1.41ab
92.66 ±1.76d
KVLSRA 2
55.50 ±2.28b
44.00 ±3.0c
94.50 ±0.50a
86.00 ±0.57b
KVLSRA 3
48.00 ±0.40a
39.33 ±0.57b
92.75±0.85a
81.66 ±0.66b
Q-52
50.75 ±0.25a
39.33 ±0.33b
92.75±0.47a
80.33 ±0.88b
Q-Q 37-1
47.25 ±0.25a
36.33 ±0.33a
92.25±0.83a
79.33 ±0.33a
Regeolona
47.50 ±0.25a
37.33 ±0.33b
92.50 ±0.28a
79.66 ±0.66b
Genotypes
Plant height (cm)
Root length (cm)
Stem diameter (cm)
No. of Leaves plant-1
Season 2015/2016
KVLSRA 1
62.72±1.24de
12.88±0.24b
0.95±0.10c
65.92±6.35c
KVLSRA 2
68.42±1.49d
12.95±0.29b
1.02±0.11bc
72.17±.10bc
KVLSRA 3
77.30±1.85b
15.1±0.50a
1.37±0.12ab
88.70±6.43b
Q-52
83.32±0.54a
14.99±0.30a
1.57±0.07a
83.00±11.34bc
Q-Q 37-1
86.45±2.94a
15.17±0.38a
1.63±0.11a
93.27±3.31a
Regeolona
81.52±4.31a
13.51±0.67ab
1.33±0.10ab
87.60±1.53bc
Season 2016/2017
KVLSRA 1
48.83 c ±1.54
7.22 c±0.17
0.91 c ±0.13
48.08 c±0.08
KVLSRA 2
53.16 c ±2.08
8.51 b±0.21
0.99 b 0.13
42.03 c±4.35
KVLSRA 3
64.53 b 0.32
8.66 b±0.47
1.30 ab 0.08
60.02bc ±1.39
Q-52
68.73 a ±1.92
9.04 ab ±0.11
1.38 a 0.07
80.71bc ±6.89
Q-Q 37-1
70.86 a ±2.62
9.93 a±0.23
1.39 a 0.08
88.13 a±3.00
Regeolona
66.16 ab 1.62
8.17bc ±0.59
1.36 a 0.12
77.63 b±5.14
Genotypes
No. of Panicles/plant
Plant fresh Weight (gm)
Yield Weight/plant (gm)
2015/16
2016/17
2015/16
2016/17
2015/16
2016/17
KVLSRA 1
8.72 b±0.31
7.59 c ±0.16
56.95 c±4.68
46.94 d±0.05
6.39 c±0.24
6.35 c±0.15
KVLSRA 2
8.53 b±0.13
8.54 bc±0.15
57.43 c±1.49
50.95 c±1.32
10.58 c ±0.16
7.79 b±0.12
KVLSRA 3
11.72 ab± 0.31
9.93 b±0.39
68.71 bc±2.14
60.57 b±1.62
13.93 b±0.18
8.98 b±0.13
Q-52
11.9 ab±0.96
9.89 b±0.77
75.12 b±4.18
62.66 b±3.46
14.29 b±0.14
9.19 a±0.45
Q-Q 37-1
12.27 a±0.24
12.1 a±0.16
82.32 a±0.81
72.26 a±1.83
17.83 a±0.28
9.79 a±0.10
Regeolona
12.1 a±0.53
11.9 a±0.06
81.6 a ±2.76
70.48 a±0.95
15.13 ab±0.16
11.35 a±0.02
Genotypes
Harvest Index (HI) %
1000 -seeds weight Index (gm)
Yield (ton fed-1)
2015/16
2016/17
2015/16
2016/17
2015/16
2016/17
KVLSRA 1
23.26 b±0.040
18.14c±1.06
2.43 ab±.04
2.33 b±0.04
1.23 b±0.44
0.77 b±0.32
KVLSRA 2
22.76 c±0.17
16.99±2.93
2.76 a±0.08
1.72 bc±0.10
1.65 ab±0.77
0.76 b±0.13
KVLSRA 3
27.73 a±0.11
21.55b±2.10
2.77 a±.09
2.75 a±0.12
1.74 a±0.43
1.04 a±0.09
Q-52
24.56 b±0.013
20.39b±1.23
2.97 a±0.13
2.68 a±0.18
1.70 a±0.73
1.02 a±0.01
Q-Q 37-1
28.89 a±0.10
18.29c±0.31
3.03 a±0.17
2.79 a±0.23
1.84 a±0.38
1.06 a±0.09
Regeolona
26.86 ab±0.15
24.16a±4.2
2.93 a±0.15
2.88 a±0.17
1.75 a±0.03
1.05 a±0.13
Genotypes
Protein (%)
Carbo- hydrates (%)
Moisture (%)
Fat (%)
Saponin (%)
KVLSRA 1
11.77 c ± 0.10
56.75 b ± 0.34
11.66 a ± 0.19
7.91 a ± 1.22
0.56 a ± 0.33
KVLSRA 2
11.61 c ±0 .06
58.00 a ± 0.05
11.16bcd± 0.09
10.01 a ± 1.62
0.43bc± 0.19
KVLSRA 3
12.35 b ± 0.11
57.66 ab ± 0.30
11.49 ab ± 0.09
8.89 a ± 1.37
0.39 c ± 0.14
Q-52
14.75 a ±0 .05
58.31 a ± 0.10
10.99 cd ± 0.19
10.44 a ± 1.18
0.43bc± 0.17
Q-Q 37-1
14.44a ± 0.05
58.17 a ± 0.02
10.83 d ± 0.98
9.18 a ± 0.32
0.50 ab ± 0.15
REGEOLONA
10.59 d ± 0.19
54.64 c ± 0.19
11.33abc± 0.01
7.14 a ± 0.53
0.37 c ± 0.28
Discussion
Salt tolerance is a complex trait and attributed to a raise of interrelated with morphological, biochemical and physiological mechanisms. In this situation, the selection and screening of quinoa genotypes for salt tolerant is an important step to persue their adaptation under marginal and poor nutrient sandy soils. Quinoa genotypes were slightly increased after 20% seawater salinity Salt-induced growth reduction is presumably due to low photosynthetic supply as a consequence of impaired photosynthetic capacity. Also, they confirmed that all growth traits of quinoa plant affected by the high levels of salinity where, this achieves depend on the kind and quantity of salt. Our results showed that salinity irrigation reduced morphological yield and its component traits for all cultivars at 2016/17 season than 2015/2016. This finding was confirmed that the salt concentrations in irrigated water and soil were much higher in second season than the first season. Our findings also, are in agreement with
Conclusion
From the data presented in this study, it could be concluded that the genotype Q-Q37-1 was earliness genotypes for 50% heading and maturity, the genotypes Q-Q37-1, Q-Q37-1, Q-Q37-1, Q-Q37-1, Q52 and Q-Q37-1 gave the high averages for number of panicles/plant, plant fresh weight, plant yield weight, harvest index, 1000 seeds weight index and yield in (ton fed-1 )the genotype Q52 and Regeolona were the best genotypes for protein and carbohydrates total content. Future experiments are in progress to pinpoint the factors related to improvement of quinoa genotypes for yield and chemical composition under salinity and drought stress conditions.