Abstract
Myelomeningocele (MMC), a class of spina bifida is a type of neural tube defect. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, each year approximately 1,400 babies born in the United States have spina bifida. The disease manifests with the lack of skin and bone covering the caudal part of the spinal cord. The patient developing such a condition often develops lifelong impaired lower limb mobility accompanied by hydrocephalus, and urinary and bowel incontinence. The available interventions include prenatal and postnatal surgery to fuse the dura. Prenatal surgery performed before 26 weeks of gestation reduces the risk of death or the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting. It also enhanced results on a comprehensive index for mental and motor function. When compared to postnatal surgery, prenatal surgery reduces the manifestation of several secondary outcomes, including the degree of hindbrain herniation seen in the Chiari II malformation.
Stem cell therapy for MMC on animal models of chick, ovine, and rodents with reported cases 15/63, 15, and 136, respectively, using human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESCs), Neural Stem Cells (NSCs), Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) showed significant coverage of MMC defect and slight neurogenesis was also observed.
With an understanding of medical literature about in-utero regenerative capacity, it is to be appreciated that placental stem cells surgically seeded within a biocompatible scaffold of the cell patches can play a part in alleviating the spinal cord manifestation associated with MMC.
Documented animal studies show that incorporating Placental Mesenchymal Stem Cells in prenatal surgery has reported improved neurogenesis and lower limb mobility. In an ovine myelomeningocele model, the development of in-utero myelomeningocele repair with human Placental Mesenchymal Stem Cells seeded onto an extracellular matrix (PMSC-ECM) enhances motor findings.
The clinical trial for the first stem cell therapy on human subjects known as the CuRe Trial: Cellular Therapy for In Utero Repair of Myelomeningocele. is expected to be finished by 2030. So far, the cases undergoing treatment have shown significant leg movement and a greater degree of bowel and urinary control. This FDA-approved clinical trial is envisioned to be the future of treating MMC.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2024
Osama Siddiqui Muhammad, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Spina bifida, a congenital neural tube defect, occurs due to certain environmental and genetic factors that lead to failure of neural tube closure by the 28th day of embryonic development Although symptoms vary from patient to patient, non-communicating hydrocephalus coexisting with hindbrain herniation is the most common association seen in MMC patients. Furthermore, it is commonly observed that patients who have MMC usually have a loss of sensation in their lower extremities and trunk, below the lesion level. Other manifesting symptoms include Chiari II malformation Cell-based therapy, as a regenerative medicine technique, is regarded as one of the most promising disciplines in modern science and medicine. Stem cell-based regenerative medicine, which allows healthcare workers to address medical problems which have limited prognoses with the current mode of interventions, has achieved significant advancements. Stem cells are the cutting edge of regenerative medicine owing to their exemplary multi-potency. One of the undifferentiated, unspecialized cells of the human body that can develop into highly specialized cells is called stem cells. Stem cells were once thought to only be able to develop into adult cells of the same organ. There are numerous examples of stem cells today that can differentiate into diverse cell types, including ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. The different types of stem cells are: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are extremely potent and regenerative Human bone marrow is the most common location for HSC extraction. HSCs have the potential to cause immune problems such as transplant rejection. HSCs, nonetheless, have shown to be a beneficial treatment technique in a range of illnesses including anemia, leukemia, and malignant lymphoma The first pluripotent cell lines to be developed were the embryonic carcinoma (EC) cell lines that were obtained from the undifferentiated portion of human and murine germ cell tumors. EC cells are not suitable for clinical application, although they have proven to be a very useful model system in the laboratory. Currently, the pre-implantation blastocyst is the established source of ESCs. When the appropriate stimuli are applied, the ability of ESCS cell lines to specialize into multiple mature cell types in culture is one of the most intriguing and significant features. Embryonic stem cells are obtained from early-stage embryos and have the ability to differentiate into all cell types in the body. Adult stem cells, on the other hand, are found in adult tissues and can differentiate into the specific cell types found in those tissues. There are two main types of embryonic stem cells: embryonic germ cells and blastomere cells. Embryonic germ cells are derived from the germ cells of early embryos and have the ability to differentiate into all cell types in the body. Blastomere cells, on the other hand, are derived from a single cell in the early-stage blastocyst and have the ability to differentiate into specific cell types in the body. In Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), stem cells are produced synthetically. Methods for inducing pluripotency in somatic cells can be classified as integrative or non-integrative. While integrative methods have been utilized for basic research, drug discovery, and disease modeling, non-integrative methods are seen to be safer and more appropriate for cell-based therapeutics Stable genetic alteration of iPSCs, on the other hand, may still play a role in treating genetic problems or improving cell characteristics for transplantation. Combining approaches or employing alternative non-integrative vectors such as episomal vectors for regenerative purposes can improve reprogramming efficiency while maintaining safety The creation of clinical-grade viral vectors is one of the most challenging aspects in creating genetically modified iPSCs for cell therapy. Producing such vectors under GMP conditions Umbilical cord blood cells collected from calves after delivery can be converted to iPSCs, which can then be differentiated into lab-grown muscle and fat cells, eliminating the requirement for animal sacrifice iPSCs, in contrast to ESCs, may be easily generated from a patient's own cells and would not be subjected to immune rejection following autologous transplantation of their germ cell derivatives As a result, deriving patient-specific gametes (particularly sperm) from iPSCs would establish the groundwork for future successful treatment of male infertility Stem cell therapy has the potential to help alleviate the burden of various conditions. According to the trials that have been published, stem cell therapy promises to be safe and effective The use of NSCs in Parkinson's disease, a neurodegenerative condition caused by the gradual loss of dopaminergic neurons, has shown encouraging outcomes. Dopaminergic neural progenitor cells can either be produced in vitro from human ESCs or isolated from the embryonic ventral midbrain iPSC Stroke leads to a lack of oxygen and nutrients for neurons. The neurological conditions most commonly treated experimentally with umbilical cord blood cells are cerebral palsy and hypoxia ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). For the treatment of cerebral palsy, umbilical cord blood cells have been used in several researches. Over the years, there have been increasing efforts to utilize stem cells in various medical fields, including surgery. The use of stem cells in surgery improves patient outcomes, reduce recovery time and enhance healing In an ongoing clinical trial, a study on pigs demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of delivering a Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) patch made from embryonic stem cells to their eyes, preserving photoreceptor cells without adverse effects on the retinal structure. The phase 1 human trial investigating a synthetic membrane for delivering human embryonic stem cell-derived RPE to patients with macular degeneration showed successful surgical delivery and sustained growth of the cells in both patients for 12 months. A the study was conducted to evaluate the ability of bone marrow-derived Mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) to repair liver tissue damage by acetaminophen in a rat model. The study found that the transplantation of BM-MSCs improved hepatocyte regeneration and repressed liver stress and inflammatory signaling. This demonstrated the potential of these cells for liver repair A recent clinical trial for diabetic foot gangrene showed that mobilized peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with recombinant human Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor effectively increased blood supply, relieving pain and alleviating cold sensations in the lower extremities of patients with diabetic foot. The use of stem cells in surgery has many benefits. Firstly, stem cells have the ability to differentiate into the specific cells that are needed to repair damaged tissues and organs, which reduces the risk of complications and improves patient outcomes, as proven above by the results of various studies. Secondly, stem cells can produce cytokines that help to stimulate the healing process, leading to faster and more effective recovery Although there are still some challenges that need to be addressed, such as the potential for ethical concerns and the need for further research, the potential benefits of using stem cells in surgery are numerous. Various pieces of research portray that the neurological manifestation of MMC gets worse with time if medical treatment therein is not provided and a patient might end up with lifelong physical impairment. As per the two-hit hypothesis, the defect in neural tube formation is the major initial cause of MMC manifestation, followed by continual exposure to an amniotic fluid which, therefore, causes further damage to neural tissue. To cure this congenital malformation of the central nervous system i.e. MMC and to prevent the exposed nervous system from infection, surgical treatment ought to be done either within 48 hours of birth postnatally or by the 26th week of gestation prenatally Before medical progress and advancement, the only treatment available for MMC was postnatal surgery followed by management of MMC-associated symptoms, but in recent years of innovation, the idea of prenatal surgery has been emerging as it’s providing promising results So far, the best treatment option to approach is open prenatal surgery for MMC. The study conducted on an animal model has unveiled the fact that neural tissue damage can be prevented by closing neural pores via prenatal surgery during the intra-uterine phase One of the other advancements made in open Spina bifida prenatal surgery is fetoscopic surgery. Although it’s a less invasive method, the outcomes are not plausible because during the procedure the uterus is insufflated with CO2, thereby causing fetal acidosis. However, certain other techniques being used in fetoscopic surgery reported satisfactory results. Previously, the standard choice of treatment for MMC was via postnatal surgery, which comes with obligatory demand of shunt placement with hindbrain herniation at 12 months and 76.1% of the child was not able to walk independently at 30 months of age, therefore minimizing the success rate of postnatal surgery. To enhance the treatment option available to MMC patients so that they can live a better life, further advancements were made thereby leading to the concept of open prenatal surgery. Even though open prenatal surgery is giving promising results, certain other maternal and neonatal risk factors still need to be considered. According to the MOMC trial, the overall rate of bradycardia seen in fetuses during prenatal surgery was 10%, perinatal death was seen in 3%, and respiratory distress syndrome in 21% of the cases Additionally, a review report by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in 2016 showed the high risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), Chorio-amniotic membrane separation, and low preterm birth weight when surgery was done prenatally Fetoscopic surgery, even though it’s a minimally invasive procedure and thought to provide better results than open fetal surgery, a study claims that there are much higher risks associated with fetoscopic surgery. Data acquired from the systemic review of multiple fetoscopic spina bifida repair studies conclude 79% preterm membrane rupture rate along with increased demand for neonatal treatment at the repair site. Lastly, one of the vital concerns that have been arising is ethical issues regarding the consideration of the fetus as a patient. This concept opens the door to philosophical, legal, and social debate. Conclusively, the aforementioned data therein suggests that further advancements ought to be considered to decrease maternal and fetal morbidity. Prenatal surgery, also known as fetal surgery, is a surgical intervention performed on a fetus in the uterus, with the aim of treating certain conditions or disorders. The concept of fetal surgery has been around for over a century, with early attempts to perform fetal surgery dating back to the 19th century. However, the first successful fetal surgery was not performed until the 1980s, when Dr. Michael Harrison of the University of California, San Francisco, performed the first open fetal surgery to correct spina bifida, a congenital disorder affecting the spinal cord Fetal medicine since then has been on the road to continuous evolution. It is marked by some key achievements that should be acknowledged. Some of these milestones include Hysterotomy for fetal vascular access for complete exchange transfusion for Rh disease (led by Liley W.), Diagnostic fetoscopy for obtaining fetal blood samples (Hobbins JC., Mahoney MJ.), Shunt-based fetal repair for Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (Harrison, Globus, Filly, Jonsen), Fetal lamb model for endoscopic MMC repair (Copeland, Bruner), Open resection of fetal cervical teratoma (Hirose, Farmer), Phase 1 trial of In Utero stem cell transplantation for treatment of fetal alpha thalassemia major (MacKenzie), etc. Advances in prenatal surgery have enabled the treatment of a wide range of conditions, including congenital heart defects Stem cell therapy has gained significant attention in recent years as a potential solution for a variety of medical conditions, including those affecting fetuses. The use of stem cells in fetal surgery offers unique opportunities for in-utero treatment of various diseases, including spina bifida, trans amniotic stem cell therapy for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and congenital heart defects. Previous clinical trials on animals for stem cell therapy in fetal surgery have reported positive outcomes. A study reported that using trans amniotic stem cell therapy for Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in an animal model showed promising results in lung development Although there are hesitations when it comes to incorporating stem cell treatment in fetal surgery, there are studies en route to battle the shortcomings. A case report showed success in utero stem cell transplantation in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. It suggests that this procedure may be a treatment option in selected cases, such as fetuses exposed to a significant risk of infectious disease A severe congenital brain abnormality known as myelomeningocele (MMC) occurs when the neural tube fails to completely close between the third and fourth week of embryonic development. Further perinatal procedures, such as the use of stem cells may improve the inadequacies of fetal surgery. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), in particular, have been used in clinical and animal trials to treat spinal cord injuries. Lee et al. became the first to adopt a cell-based therapeutic strategy to treat MMC. By intra-amniotic injection of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) into a surgical chick embryo model of MMC, they investigated the ability of the defect to close. The hESCs were taken from refrigerated human blastocysts and introduced into the amniotic cavity as undifferentiated cells using a glucose phosphate-buffered saline media. The researchers demonstrated that the hESCs group's MMC defect lengths were diminished when compared to the controls. However, there were no studies to back up this theory. They proposed that the paracrine activity of the cell and the mechanical bridging effect were the hESCs strategies to promote MMC closure. Neural stem cells (NSCs) were first used in an ovine model by Fauza et al. In an MMC rodent model, the same team worked with rats' NSCs.On embryonic day 10, a single intragastric retinoic acid dose chemically induced the MMC. Amniotic fluid from the dam was used to extract NSCs.On embryonic day 17, they introduced NScs into the amniotic fluid. NSCs maintained an undifferentiated form and were found mainly on vulnerable neural surfaces at embryonic day 21, according to their observations. Using another model, they verified the viability of intra-amniotic injection of stem cells to repair MMC. In the retinoic acid-induced rat model at embryonic day 17, Abe et al. experimented with intra-amniotic injections of xenologous human amniotic fluid CD117-positive stem cells (hAFSCs). Their findings demonstrated that treatment with hAFSCs encourages skin coverage of the cutaneous defect. Additionally, the authors found significantly more tubulin ß-III in the spinal cords of the hAFSCs group, which might be related to enhanced neurogenesis in the MMC lesion. Do-Hun Lee investigated the ability of a human bone marrow stem cell line (B10) and a neural stem cell line (F3) to promote reclosure in spinal open neural tube defects (ONTDs) in chick embryos at Hamburger and Hamilton stage 18 or 19. For each of the four groups—the untreated control, F3, B10, and HFF-1 (human foreskin fibroblast), chick embryos that made it through the process were retrieved. The control group's embryos underwent ONTD surgery but received no cell injection. At 3, 5, and 7 days following injection, HFF (human foreskin fibroblast) groups and the B10 group demonstrated improved reclosure. ONTDs were not covered by F3 cells. When exposed to chick amniotic fluid in vitro for 48 hours, the cell survival of F3 cells was considerably lower than that of B10 cells. The outcomes demonstrated that B10 cells, not direct cell integration, but rather covering and preserving brain tissues, improve the reclosure of ONTDs. Since F3 cells do not survive well in the amniotic fluid, there may be a connection between this and the F3 group's lack of reclosure capacity. To upgrade functional outcomes for individuals with congenital abnormalities, research is being produced to tap the potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in promoting prenatal healing. Diana Lee Farmer is conducting a clinical trial (NCT04652908) with primary outcome measures that assess the safety of the placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cell loaded on an extracellular matrix (PMSC-ECM) Product. The intervention includes the use of sonographic supervision. Under sonographic supervision, the initial uterine entry will be made using a uterine stapling device or something similar, just like in the present conventional fetal surgery. The fetus will receive a paralyzing and painkiller intramuscular injection. Under magnification, the myelomeningocele will be closed systematically. The spinal cord will be separated from the surrounding tissue and allowed to fall into the spinal canal, much like in a typical prenatal operation. Next, the PMSC ECM component will be sized to the spinal cord's dimensions and administered topically, cell side down. The material will be stitched to the PMSC-ECM product. The fetal skin will thereafter be closed in the usual way. Antibiotics will also be added along with a replacement of the amniotic fluid volume in the womb. Safety of the placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cell (PMSC-ECM) Product ( Time Frame: Assessed at birth ) This will be evaluated to determine whether or not there is a cerebrospinal fluid leak, an infection at the MMC repair site, failure of the MMC repair site to heal, and development of any unexpected growths or tumour formation. These outcomes will be evaluated by a physical examination, brain and spinal MRI, and brain and spinal ultrasonography after delivery. Efficacy of the PMSC-ECM Product (Time Frame: 30 months.) This is mainly assessed by observing improvement in motor function exceeding two levels beyond what would be expected based on the anatomical level of the defect, along with evaluation of the patient's capacity for independent walking.Anorectal manometry and caregiver questionnaires on bowel habits will be used to evaluate bowel function. The evaluation of urologic function will be conducted through the use of video urodynamics, renal and bladder ultrasounds, and caregiver questionnaires to screen for hydronephrosis and abnormalities of the bladder